Are you letting the machines decide your metrics?
AI can default to measuring whatever is easiest to find and simplest for another system to score, regardless of intent. Time for some human oversight, says Robert Vilkelis. ...
by Anna Cajot Published April 10, 2026 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
When emotions run high and the negotiation more closely resembles a power struggle than an effort by both parties to reach an agreement, one of the best ways to break the deadlock is to de-escalate by taking the tension out of the room. De-escalate by:
Remember: Nonverbal reinforcement, when used to reward and reciprocate, is just as powerful as verbal affirmation. If the opposing party begins to relax their stance, it’s important to respond in kind, mirroring their posture, softening your tone, and maintaining a neutral or pleasant facial expression.
Trust is one of the main components of successful high-stakes negotiations. As the stakes rise, so does the complexity of trust. Re-establish trust by:
Remember: In some cultures, trust is based on pedigree or reputation, while in others it’s established through demonstrating competence. The brain constantly evaluates trust, so it must be shown and not simply claimed.
If formal negotiations are no longer effective, you need an additional communication channel. Such “backchannel” negotiations are informal, off-the-record discussions that occur alongside formal negotiations. How to do it:
Remember: While backchannel negotiations are a powerful tool, it’s vital to ensure that nothing said or done during formal negotiations creates unnecessary hostility. A “scorched-earth approach,” where relationships are damaged beyond repair, can harm a negotiator’s reputation and make it nearly impossible to resume discussions.
Deadlocks arise when both parties have tested each other’s limits to the point where you have to shift the focus from dominance to resolution. To break the impasse, de-escalate, build trust and use back channels to find a way to move forward.
International Director at the Schranner Negotiation Institute
Anna Cajot is the International Director at the Schranner Negotiation Institute, where she leads a think tank focused on high-stakes negotiations and high-performance leadership. She provides senior executives with a comprehensive support system, offering access to an exclusive network of the world’s top negotiation experts to help them navigate and lead complex negotiations with confidence and success.
5 hours ago • by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
AI can default to measuring whatever is easiest to find and simplest for another system to score, regardless of intent. Time for some human oversight, says Robert Vilkelis. ...
October 14, 2026 • by Peter Lorange, Peter Vogel in Brain Circuits
Two actionable toolkits to preserve control: flexible exits with governance frameworks, and family councils that foster cohesion...
October 13, 2026 • by Michael R. Wade, Konstantinos Trantopoulos , Mark J. Greeven in Brain Circuits
Uncover what truly drives value in digital ecosystems: debunk myths and learn governance, data practices, and collaboration strategies...
October 8, 2026 • by Salvatore Cantale, Konstantinos Trantopoulos , Michael R. Wade in Brain Circuits
CFOs in the AI era: design data-models and workflows that maximize value, redefine productivity, and establish transparent AI governance....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience