Are myths about women who network holding you back?
Networking is vital for career advancement, yet women still face unique challenges when building professional relationships. Jennifer Jordan debunks three common misconceptions....
Brain Circuits
The SAMBA model for ethical decision-making
We are very good at expressing our positions on ethical issues but less good at explaining them. Use this template to set out your position clearly for all to understand.
The SAMBA model
Ethical decision-making challenges us every day, be it in our private lives, our professional lives, at an organizational level, or in a political or economic context. The SAMBA model encourages ethical decision-making through four steps: 1. See and understand the reality; 2. Analyze the reality from a Moral standpoint; 3. Be the ethical judge; 4. Act accordingly!
S – See and understand the reality
This means trying to be as objective as possible about an issue. This is done through being informed by relevant scientific disciplines on what the ‘reality’ is now before trying to assess it ethically. (For example, by informing yourself on a particular issue through appropriate legal, sociological, or psychological research.)
A, M – Analyze the reality from a Moral standpoint
The next step is to analyze the reality from a moral standpoint. Which ethical theory or principle out of the many available will you use to make your ethical assessment? By clarifying which ethical principle you are using, you are being fully transparent in your reasoning when you adjudge something to be just or unjust.
B – Be the ethical judge
Once you have arrived at your position, apply your judgment in a way that is justified rationally. This is about explaining the underlying rationale for making an ethical judgment, as opposed to holding that view based on emotion or intuition (which is not helpful in conflict resolution).
A – Act accordingly
This relates to the practice-oriented nature of ethics. If we believe that something is ethically right, we should try to act on that belief in our decisions and actions. Conversely, if we believe that an action is ethically wrong, we should avoid doing it.
Key learnings
Karl Marx famously said: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world…The point, however, is to change it.” We need to do both. Ethics is often very good at criticizing something, but the point is to use it in a way that has real-world utility (i.e.; is solutions-oriented). If you criticize something from a moral point of view, you should at least propose some ideas on how the problem can be resolved.
Authors
Related
Tool or talent – how is your organization using AI?
AI has the potential to become a super-useful teammate, but CHROs must manage its deployment with care. Answer the questions below to check how employees feel about its adoption and watch out...
Beware the silent fourth: Are you fawning your way through leadership?
We’re all familiar with fight, flight, or freeze stress responses. But clinical psychologist Ingrid Clayton identifies a fourth survival strategy lurking in your neural circuitry that most leadership training misses – and...
CHROs: Think skills, not jobs, to realize radical productivity gains
A skills-powered approach to talent management can boost agility, efficiency, and productivity, but transitioning to it is a complex undertaking. Ravin Jesuthasan explains how to get started and identifies the eight pillars...