
How to maximize your social media impact
Are you investing heavily in a strong leadership presence on social media but have no idea if it’s paying off? If so, use the proof, people, and place trifecta to deliver breakout results....

by Peter G. Kirchschläger Published November 27, 2024 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
Ethical decision-making challenges us every day, be it in our private lives, our professional lives, at an organizational level, or in a political or economic context. The SAMBA model encourages ethical decision-making through four steps: 1. See and understand the reality; 2. Analyze the reality from a Moral standpoint; 3. Be the ethical judge; 4. Act accordingly!
This means trying to be as objective as possible about an issue. This is done through being informed by relevant scientific disciplines on what the ‘reality’ is now before trying to assess it ethically. (For example, by informing yourself on a particular issue through appropriate legal, sociological, or psychological research.)
The next step is to analyze the reality from a moral standpoint. Which ethical theory or principle out of the many available will you use to make your ethical assessment? By clarifying which ethical principle you are using, you are being fully transparent in your reasoning when you adjudge something to be just or unjust.
Once you have arrived at your position, apply your judgment in a way that is justified rationally. This is about explaining the underlying rationale for making an ethical judgment, as opposed to holding that view based on emotion or intuition (which is not helpful in conflict resolution).
This relates to the practice-oriented nature of ethics. If we believe that something is ethically right, we should try to act on that belief in our decisions and actions. Conversely, if we believe that an action is ethically wrong, we should avoid doing it.
Â
Karl Marx famously said: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world…The point, however, is to change it.” We need to do both. Ethics is often very good at criticizing something, but the point is to use it in a way that has real-world utility (i.e.; is solutions-oriented). If you criticize something from a moral point of view, you should at least propose some ideas on how the problem can be resolved.

Peter G Kirchschlaeger is Ethics-Professor and Director of the Institute of Social Ethics (ISE) at the University of Lucerne, visiting professor at the Chair of Neuroinformatics and Neural Systems at ETH Zurich and at the ETH AI Center, as well as a research fellow at the University of the Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa. He is an expert consultant in ethics for international organizations, President a.i. of the Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology, and Director of the new master degree program on ethics at the University of Lucerne.

24 hours ago • by Prashant Saxena in Brain Circuits
Are you investing heavily in a strong leadership presence on social media but have no idea if it’s paying off? If so, use the proof, people, and place trifecta to deliver breakout results....

April 15, 2026 • by I by IMD in Brain Circuits
How CFOs can lead digital transformation by focusing investments, aligning strategy with execution, and embracing agile planning to drive resilience and growth....

April 14, 2026 • by Cyril Bouquet in Brain Circuits
Cyril Bouquet shows how to improve your return on AI investment by matching your strategy to your organizational reality and selecting among four different AI innovation approaches....

April 10, 2026 • by Anna Cajot in Brain Circuits
Anna Cajot draws on the experience of former FBI agent Joe Navarro to overcome an impasse when you're locked in critical talks....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience