
How to lead when you’re not the expert: Part 2 – Team doubts
Diagnose team doubts and turn uncertainty into trust. A practical guide for new leaders to identify causes and win buy-in with calm, strategic steps....

by Peter G. Kirchschläger Published November 27, 2024 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
Ethical decision-making challenges us every day, be it in our private lives, our professional lives, at an organizational level, or in a political or economic context. The SAMBA model encourages ethical decision-making through four steps: 1. See and understand the reality; 2. Analyze the reality from a Moral standpoint; 3. Be the ethical judge; 4. Act accordingly!
This means trying to be as objective as possible about an issue. This is done through being informed by relevant scientific disciplines on what the ‘reality’ is now before trying to assess it ethically. (For example, by informing yourself on a particular issue through appropriate legal, sociological, or psychological research.)
The next step is to analyze the reality from a moral standpoint. Which ethical theory or principle out of the many available will you use to make your ethical assessment? By clarifying which ethical principle you are using, you are being fully transparent in your reasoning when you adjudge something to be just or unjust.
Once you have arrived at your position, apply your judgment in a way that is justified rationally. This is about explaining the underlying rationale for making an ethical judgment, as opposed to holding that view based on emotion or intuition (which is not helpful in conflict resolution).
This relates to the practice-oriented nature of ethics. If we believe that something is ethically right, we should try to act on that belief in our decisions and actions. Conversely, if we believe that an action is ethically wrong, we should avoid doing it.
Karl Marx famously said: “The philosophers have only interpreted the world…The point, however, is to change it.” We need to do both. Ethics is often very good at criticizing something, but the point is to use it in a way that has real-world utility (i.e.; is solutions-oriented). If you criticize something from a moral point of view, you should at least propose some ideas on how the problem can be resolved.

Peter G Kirchschlaeger is Ethics-Professor and Director of the Institute of Social Ethics (ISE) at the University of Lucerne, visiting professor at the Chair of Neuroinformatics and Neural Systems at ETH Zurich and at the ETH AI Center, as well as a research fellow at the University of the Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa. He is an expert consultant in ethics for international organizations, President a.i. of the Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology, and Director of the new master degree program on ethics at the University of Lucerne.

August 4, 2026 • by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Diagnose team doubts and turn uncertainty into trust. A practical guide for new leaders to identify causes and win buy-in with calm, strategic steps....

July 30, 2026 • by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
Middle managers shield teams from brutal leadership. Learn to stop buffering, translate conflict, and steer strategy with clear trade-offs....

July 28, 2026 in Brain Circuits
Many organizations think they have created an ecosystem, but fall well short. Answer the questions below to check whether your “ecosystem” is sustainable in the long term....

July 23, 2026 • by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Habits form in the basal ganglia and can resist effort - discover substitution strategies that replace old routines with productive ones at work....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience