
Tool up: How to use AI as your personal thought-leadership partner
Turn AI into your thought-leadership partner: four key practices to sustain flow, align ideas, and boost strategic clarity....

by Jennifer Jordan Published March 14, 2025 in Brain Circuits ⢠3 min read
Answer: False
Assimilation is where the individual conforms to the prevailing organizational culture and subsumes their identity. In contrast, belonging is where the individual turns up as the self they originally brought to the table ā and is celebrated as such.
Answer: True
Many people (me included) predicted that, given their comfort with technology and connecting remotely, Gen Z employees would weather the lockdown much better than older people. This was wrong. The āremote experienceā was very isolating for many young adults and their incidence of mental illness increased by more than 25%, while suicide rates also increased.
Answer: False
Belonging is not an āI-win-so-you-loseā game whereby, as one group or individual gains a seat at the table, another loses theirs. In contrast to an abundance-driven view of belonging, this scarcity mindset propagates a feeling of systemic exclusion and fuels some peopleās rejection of a more inclusive society.
a. 25%
b. 50%
c. 75%
Answer: c
According to a 2023 study by Ernst & Young, 75% of workers have felt excluded at work, while almost 60% feel they canāt share a core part of their identity at work for fear of it holding them back. This number is even higher for LGBTQ+ worker respondents, with 77% feeling uncomfortable sharing aspects of their identity at work.
A feeling of not belonging at work can lead to a lack of engagement by employees. An inclusion-oriented approach in which individuals feel equally valued helps create a culture where people are motivated to contribute to their maximum ability.

Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jenniferās teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

June 18, 2026 ⢠by Francesca-Giulia Mereu, Paolo Cervini in Brain Circuits
Turn AI into your thought-leadership partner: four key practices to sustain flow, align ideas, and boost strategic clarity....

June 17, 2026 ⢠by Prashant Saxena, Nikita Gundala in Brain Circuits
With AI making it harder to tell what is real, leaders face growing skepticism. Hereās how to check whether people believe what you say about yourself and the organization. ...

June 16, 2026 ⢠by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
AI can make existing organizational norms harder to see by āflatteningā them. Hereās how to stop it producing a more homogenous culture, instead of a more inclusive one....

June 11, 2026 ⢠by Robert Hooijberg in Brain Circuits
Protect your pipeline: actionable steps to develop leaders from entry-level roles as AI transforms junior work tasks....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience