
How to be remembered for the right reasons #2: Get into their world
In the second of a five-part series on effective communication for leaders, Robert Vilkelis sets out a four-step framework for translating your expertise into audience impact. ...
by Heather Cairns-Lee, Alexander Fleischmann Published March 24, 2025 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
A client is late for a meeting. On arrival, she says, “I’m sorry, my assistant told me to leave earlier because of the heavy traffic but I just couldn’t make it!” You respond, “Well, she was right, the traffic is really bad!”
This is an example of automatic association – you unthinkingly associated the word “assistant” with a woman, because women have traditionally occupied support roles. Try using more gender-neutral language, e.g., “They were right.”
In a meeting, you say “We need fresh young minds for this project.” You realize that your language is ageist but, to avoid discomfort, you carry on talking without skipping a beat.
This is an example where fear of causing embarrassment (by correcting your associating fresh minds with youth) can exacerbate a culture of not admitting mistakes or the role that language plays in stereotyping people. It’s crucial for leaders to admit mistakes and to be curious about the impact of language on culture.
In your comprehensive handbook for inclusive communication, you refer to “the disabled.”
Referring to “the disabled” is labeling and can be seen as dehumanizing – it characterizes individuals with disabilities as a homogenous group who are primarily defined by having a disability. Consult with the Employee Resource Group (ERG) on disabilities and neurodiversity or a trusted colleague regarding more appropriate terminology.
Inclusive language is a deliberate practice to check assumptions and stereotypes about gender, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, ability, and other dimensions of diversity. Try using the R-E-A-L approach (Recognizing, Exploring, Acknowledging, and Learning) to create a culture of curiosity.
If you use exclusionary language, acknowledge that you made a mistake. Recognize that your choice of words may have offended, then rephrase using a more inclusive alternative.
When referring to individuals, groups, or geographic regions, identify the terms preferred by those you’re addressing by consulting them. The preferred terminology often centers on the people and not on their characteristics, e.g., people with disabilities. This avoids the use of labels such as disabled, autistic, etc., and humanizes the individual.
All words come with a history, but the history of some words is rooted in sexism, racism, ableism, homophobia, etc. Staying curious about the origins and associations of words and listening attentively broadens your understanding of how language can divide or include.
Remain open to different perspectives. Rather than shutting down a conversation because you’re afraid of saying the wrong thing, your role is to open the discussion.
Like any cultural change, a commitment to creating a more inclusive organization must come from the top. Inclusive leaders role model how to listen and challenge assumptions when it comes to inclusive communication to make the workplace welcoming for everyone to thrive.
From getting it right, to being REAL. A guide to inclusive communication for executives
Inclusive Language and Images (White paper by IMD in collaboration with EqualVoice)
The theory of equality will change the workplace forever
Cut bias to unlock your team’s potential across the spectrum
Affiliate Professor of Leadership and Communication
Heather Cairns-Lee is Affiliate Professor of Leadership and Communication at IMD. She is a member of IMD’s Equity, Inclusion and Diversity Council and an experienced executive coach. She works to develop reflective and responsible leaders and caring inclusive cultures in organizations and society.
Equity, Inclusion and Diversity Research Affiliate
Alexander received his PhD in organization studies from WU Vienna University of Economics and Business researching diversity in alternative organizations. His research focuses on inclusion and how it is measured, inclusive language and images, ableism and LGBTQ+ at work as well as possibilities to organize solidarity. His work has appeared in, amongst others, Organization; Work, Employment and Society; Journal of Management and Organization and Gender in Management: An International Journal.
July 31, 2025 • by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
In the second of a five-part series on effective communication for leaders, Robert Vilkelis sets out a four-step framework for translating your expertise into audience impact. ...
July 29, 2025 • by Michael Netzley in Brain Circuits
Uncertainty can trigger two very different brain responses: one that broadens thinking, enables connections, and fosters innovation, and one that can undermine judgment via a stress response. Take this quick test to...
July 29, 2025 • by Camille Henderson-Davis in Brain Circuits
Have you reached a point in your career where “scientist” no longer captures the value you bring to your organization? It’s an exciting milestone, but it can also present challenges you feel...
July 24, 2025 • by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
In the first of a series of five brain circuits on effective communication for leaders, Robert Vilkelis provides techniques to help manage your nerves and deliver a high-impact presentation by focusing on...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience