
Longevity in office – good or bad?
Longevity was once seen by traditionalists as a proxy for good leadership, but successive generations attach less value to length of time served. As with anything, there are benefits and disadvantages. Here...

by Knut Haanaes, Frédéric Dalsace Published December 21, 2021 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
Some firms are moving towards sustainability better than others. There are lessons you can learn from them and implement at your own company.
Sustainability, you could say, is the new Olympic sport. It’s being performed in exemplary manner by those who do it so well they could take home a medal for it, but how well is it being practiced by everyone else?
Not as well as it could be, and this is partly because too much focus tends to be put on changing the processes in the firm but it’s about more than that. We can see this by looking at the top players – from Schneider Electric, to Neste, to Ørsted – and finding common threads.
Imagine you’re being called in to your company’s Board of Directors meeting to present a vision for a company sustainability plan. Take 2 minutes now to brainstorm a few key ideas, and then compare them with the 4 areas below where we see the leading firms in sustainability converging.
Otherwise put, they make sustainability mainstream. Can you actually think of a reason why sustainability and strategy should be separated? We can’t, but they continue to be so in the main part. However, Schneider Electric has forged new ground by melding the two most senior positions in both ambits together to create a Chief Strategy and Sustainability Officer.
If your organization’s culture is to be bold, then disrupt yourself with sustainability; if it is to be very fact-based then take that line with sustainability too- Knut Haanaes & Frédéric Dalsace
The best firms’ sustainability strategies are aligned with their most successful existing values. A case in point: Neste’s sustainability strategy is bottom up because the existing culture values decentralization and putting things in clusters.
If your organization’s culture is to be bold, then disrupt yourself with sustainability; if it is to be very fact-based then take that line with sustainability too.
There’s a huge difference between this approach and getting bogged down with goals to, for instance, having minimal footprint. Otherwise seen, it’s about aligning with the biggest force and maximizing the positives, as opposed to minimizing the negatives.
This is all about choosing people – let’s call them “change agents” – who are not just thinkers or even dreamers, but have an operational mindset and are willing to be champions of sustainability.
Firms such as L’Oréal know that they need people who are knowledgeable about the company operations leading their sustainability efforts. In particular, two women had a great influence at L’Oréal in this ambit and one was brought into the company while the other was an insider. So there’s no hard and fast rule there.
Attention needs to be paid to the processes and systems required to make things happen, and to have a ripple – or trickle – effect across the company.
There’s no one-size-fits all. Schneider Electric created a three-year Schneider Sustainability Impact (SSI) Index with quarterly reporting and external audits. L’Oréal became highly active in sustainability when sustainability targets were included in the bonus of top executives.
Questions should be asked across departments such as: How can we align the work of sustainability with the ordinary processes of the company? But remember that process alone will not suffice: it’s the sum of the whole range of actions taken that will see change.

Lundin Chair Professor of Sustainability at IMD
Knut Haanaes is a former Dean of the Global Leadership Institute at the World Economic Forum. He was previously a Senior Partner at the Boston Consulting Group and founded their first sustainability practice. At IMD he teaches in many of the key programs, including the MBA, and is Co-Director of the Leading Sustainable Business Transformation program (LSBT) and the Driving Sustainability from the Boardroom (DSB) program. His research interests are related to strategy, digital transformation, and sustainability.

Professor of Marketing and Strategy at IMD
Frédéric Dalsace focuses on B2B issues sustainability, inclusive business models, and alleviating poverty. Prior to IMD, he spent 16 years as a Professor at HEC Paris where he held the Social Business / Enterprise and Poverty Chair presided by Nobel Laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus. Prior to his academic life, Frédéric accumulated more than 10 years of experience in the business world, both with industrial companies (Michelin and CarnaudMetalbox) and as a strategy consultant with McKinsey & Company. At IMD, he is Director of the Integrating Sustainability into Strategy program.

16 hours ago • by Cindy Wolpert in Brain Circuits
Longevity was once seen by traditionalists as a proxy for good leadership, but successive generations attach less value to length of time served. As with anything, there are benefits and disadvantages. Here...

November 20, 2025 • by Richard Roi in Brain Circuits
Progressing internal talent helps hedge against new CEO failure, but it all hinges on integrating leadership development and succession planning. Ric Roi identifies the warning signs for organizations that fail to put...

November 19, 2025 • by Howard H. Yu in Brain Circuits
Leaders are under pressure to project certainty and to know all the answers. Answer the following questions honestly, then check out the reasons why, if you don’t know the answer, it’s often...

November 18, 2025 • by Eric Quintane in Brain Circuits
The most resilient and innovative organizations work fluidly across internal boundaries, but many managers are resistant to their reports connecting with people outside their team. Answer the questions below to check whether...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience