Is AI scaling your worst habits?
Could AI mirror your organization’s worst habits? Five actionable steps turn human systems into robust infrastructure with clear values and governance....
by Ginka Toegel Published December 10, 2025 in Brain Circuits • 4 min read
A recent study, The Cybernetic Teammate, found that “having an AI on your team can increase performance, provide expertise, and improve your experience.” One key factor is that, while human-only teams tend to work in silos, AI helps participants bridge divides between functions and roles. But if organizations roll out new technologies carelessly, people will rapidly conclude that AI is coming for their jobs. Watch out for these three potential impacts:
A sensible and clear definition of a team’s boundaries is critical to effective collaboration. Will team members willingly include AI as an additional team member, or will they attempt to exclude it? These attitudes will be central to the effectiveness of AI-powered teams.
Complex interpersonal relationships shape team dynamics. AI will process data and generate insights faster than any human teammate, but will miss the unspoken social dynamics that humans naturally detect.
Teams are subject to conflict around tasks, processes, and relationships. How will AI affect this? People might find AI difficult to work with or assume it is inherently correct. This could give rise to counterproductive resistance – or even attempts to sabotage the AI’s functioning.
Promote an experimental mindset within clear boundaries (including around privacy and bias), while going to great lengths to reassure colleagues that AI’s prime function is to help human workers, not replace them.
AI can read human emotions from facial expressions. Train it to recognize the warning signs of problems in a team, such as growing tension or emerging conflicts.
Try providing employees with access to AI principally as a personal tool. This offers them a stronger sense of control, sidestepping issues around team boundaries, emotional responses, and conflicts.
Another option is to set up AI team members as passive listeners who participate only when asked (but remember that this and the above approach constrain AI from adding maximum value).
The way we think about AI is changing fundamentally. CHROs have a key role to play in guiding its adoption to maximize its potential benefits and minimize possible adverse impact on teams.
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Ginka Toegel is a teacher, facilitator, and researcher in the areas of leadership and human behavior. Specialized in providing one-to-one leadership coaching and team-building workshops to top management teams in both the public and private sector, her major research focuses on leadership development, team dynamics, and coaching. She is also Director of the Strategies for Leadership program and the Mobilizing People program.
October 1, 2026 • by Susanne May in AI
Could AI mirror your organization’s worst habits? Five actionable steps turn human systems into robust infrastructure with clear values and governance....
September 22, 2026 • by Michael Yaziji in AI
Question central planning: why a unit-focused hybrid approach may outperform both centralized control and chaotic AI adoption....
September 15, 2026 • by Naomi Haefner in AI
Discover why cybersecurity begins with people: continuous training and psychological safety that harden defenses beyond technology alone....
September 10, 2026 • by Amit Joshi in AI
CHROs can help businesses move past mistrust of AI and support workforce adoption. Ask yourself these six questions to make sure you’re easing the way and not piling on top-down pressure. ...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience