A house with weak foundations
Krupa’s early diagnosis was structural rather than cyclical. He often uses a simple analogy: “We inherited a house which had weak foundations.” For him, capital strength was not an abstract regulatory ratio but the basis of trust. “No company can thrive with weak foundations – a bank even less than any other company.”
Raising Societe Generale’s CET1 ratio – the bank’s core capital buffer relative to the risks on its balance sheet – by roughly one percentage point was equivalent to building between €4bn and €5bn of extra capital. The critical decision was how to get there. Rather than raising equity and diluting shareholders who had already endured years of underperformance, Krupa opted to rebuild internally through retained earnings, cost control, and portfolio simplification. The aim was to strengthen the bank without asking investors for another act of faith.
This shift in capital strength was not only financial; it changed the bank’s operating posture. With a stronger buffer, management could plan with a longer horizon and reduce the defensive decision-making that had characterized earlier years. Restoring credibility with regulators and investors, Krupa argued, also restored room to maneuver internally.
That logic drove a series of disposals that, while financially rational, were historically and emotionally significant. Some of the businesses sold had been part of the group for decades; one subsidiary in Morocco had been with the bank for more than a century. “We didn’t take this decision lightly,” Krupa said. “But this was, without a doubt, the right decision for the group, not only today, but in the long term.”
For him, this was a matter of leadership responsibility. “It’s the job of a CEO to make decisions.” When facing doubt, he applies a simple rule: “What’s best for the long-term success and sustainability of the company? Nine times out of 10, the answer is very easy.” At the same time, he insisted on responsible execution – avoiding fire sales, unsuitable buyers, and outcomes that would undermine the future of employees and clients.