Is business longevity always the right goal?Â
While the Japanese model highlights the power of continuity, it also invites reflection. Based on our global work with enterprising families, the more fundamental question is not how to achieve longevity, but whether longevity, defined as preserving a specific business, is the right aspiration for every family.Â
Younger generations may experience tension between honoring legacy and pursuing renewal, innovation, or entirely new ventures. Longevity of the operating business does not automatically guarantee long-term family cohesion, fulfilment, or wealth creation. As a result, many families benefit from broadening their definition of success beyond survival alone.Â
This is where ownership strategy becomes critical. Families face inherent trade-offs between growth, liquidity, and control. Prioritizing long-term control may support continuity but often constrains growth. Conversely, pursuing scale and transformation may require sharing or relinquishing control. Neither path is inherently superior; what matters is conscious choice and alignment with family values and capabilities.Â
Some families, like those behind global champions such as Volkswagen or Walmart, have accepted diluted control in exchange for growth. Others, such as Miele, have chosen to preserve a strong family core while diversifying into new activities. In these cases, the original business may represent only part of a broader family portfolio, shifting the focus from business longevity to family continuity.Â
The Carvajal family, recent winner of the IMD Global Family Business Award, illustrates this evolution particularly well. Facing the challenges of a fourth-generation transition, the family restructured its business, divested activities, and appointed a strong mix of family- and non-family leadership. At the same time, it invested heavily in governance, education, and entrepreneurial support to ensure that the business family – not just the legacy firm – continued to thrive.Â