The progress of women into top leadership roles has stalled. Fortune reports that the share of female CEOs in its Fortune 500 list plateaued in 2025 and is expected to shrink in 2026, arresting decades of slow but steady momentum. At the same time, data from LinkedInâs global user base suggests that women currently represent just 30.6% of VP or C-suite positions globally â up only 0.2 percentage points from 2022. The outlook for women on boards is no better. According to a 2026 Women on Boards report, the female share of new board appointments has hit something of a wall. In the third quarter of last year, women made up just 22.5% of 448 new seats in the Russell 3000; the lowest rate in the past decade, the report says.
Meanwhile, there are signs that the female leadership pool may be shrinking. Global non-profit Catalyst finds that almost half a million American women quit their jobs in 2025; an alarming attrition of talent in the US labor market with its roots in pay inequity, inflexible work schedules, and caregiving responsibilities, coupled with the high cost of childcare, according to their survey. Another survey, this one by Deloitte Global, reveals that only 5% of women plan to remain with their current employer for more than five years â a function, say most, of work-life imbalance, rigid working hours, and pay and benefit issues.
Organizations everywhere should be paying close attention to these cues and signals. Because when women stop progressing in the workplace, when they donât make it into the executive echelons of decision-making and direction-setting â when they exit the workforce altogether â the impact on business is invariably negative.
Studies show a consistent correlation between greater gender parity and stronger outcomes. In terms of hard stats alone, McKinsey research shows that companies in the top 25% for gender diversity are 27% more likely to outperform the industry average. Those with women in their executive committees earn almost twice as much (47% more) return on equity than others. Companies led by women as well as men are more competitive. Theyâre also more agile, more innovative, and more resilient.
There is evidence that in the age of AI, women increasingly possess capabilities that organizations will need â including greater multidomain and cross-functional experience, as well as non-linearity and its corollary adaptability, giving them the breadth and ambidexterity to navigate change and volatility.
Women are arguably ahead in the capabilities the future demands. But they are clearly behind in access to the roles that convert capability into power. Organizations that fail to progress female talent to the highest levels of decision-making may be holding back the very talent they need to secure a competitive edge, to sustain growth, and move forward in our digitally disrupted future.
So, what measures can forward-looking decision-makers take to redress this balance?
Leadership machinery refers to the formal and informal systems that determine who rises to the top of an organization, and who doesnât.
Interventions such as awareness-building, auditing, education â especially when cost or work schedules are barriers to access â can only drive meaningful and lasting impact when organizations commit to redesigning the very machinery of leadership. What do I mean by that?
Leadership machinery refers to the formal and informal systems that determine who rises to the top of an organization, and who doesnât.
It includes succession planning processes, assignment decisions, sponsorship behaviors, promotion criteria, performance evaluations, and the forums where talent is debated and endorsed. While often invisible, this machinery exerts enormous influence over careers and governs the flow of opportunity and advancement.
Redesigning leadership machinery means shifting from reliance on individual goodwill to creating a system that consistently produces equitable access to opportunity, accountability in decision-making, and predictable outcomes in executive advancement.
To redress the balance in terms of who reaches the top, organizations will need to redesign the very mechanisms that decide who becomes visible, who gains critical experience, and who is actively advanced.
This can be understood as a Power Triad that simultaneously targets these three control points:
Together, these mechanisms form a closed system: feeder roles build the pipeline, sponsorship activates it, and succession locks it into decision-making. When governed as one system rather than three initiatives, the Power Triad shifts gender equity from aspiration to executive accountability. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
Executive feeder roles. Most executives are promoted from a small set of high-impact roles such as P&L leadership, transformation mandates, crisis assignments, M&A integration, and turnarounds. These should be formally designated executive feeder roles and governed accordingly. Organizations should publish annual gender access rates for these positions and establish minimum thresholds for every business unit. Persistent imbalance must trigger leadership intervention reviews, and not quiet acceptance. Critically, this will shift action upstream: gender-balanced feeder roles break invisible gatekeeping by governing the door that opens into power â instead of auditing who leaves the leadership pipeline after being blocked.
Sponsorship. Sponsorship must shift from goodwill gesture to a formal leadership obligation. What does this look like? In practice, every executive should be evaluated on the women they actively sponsor, including stretch roles secured, promotions achieved, visibility created with boards and decision forums, and succession slate nominations made. Formalized sponsorship shifts advancement from programs and one-off interventions to systemic behavioral accountability, where real career acceleration occurs.
Succession slates. Succession is the organizationâs institutional memory of who is truly being prepared for power. To support equity, succession slates need to evolve from informal lists to formal, visible, and accountable leadership instruments. Every executive role from Vice President and above should strive for a gender-balanced slate of between 40â60% âready nowâ and âready soonâ candidates. These slates should be reviewed quarterly by the Executive Committee. Roles that fail to meet this standard should be flagged as risky and accompanied by corrective action plans with named executive owners and deadlines.
Sponsorship without succession governance relies on heroics rather than systems.
The Power Triad works only when all three levers move together because succession without feeder roles produces symbolic slates. Feeder roles without sponsorship create stalled readiness. Sponsorship without succession governance relies on heroics rather than systems.
To effectively redesign the machinery of leadership, you need to see the Power Triad as one operating system â and tie it directly to performance evaluation and reward.
Organizations can institute a quarterly Power Triad Review at the Executive Committee (ExCom) level. The critical indicators of progress would include:
Executives should be required to explain misalignment. For example: âYou have feeder-role parity but no succession representation, why?â âYou sponsor three women, but none are receiving pivotal assignments, whatâs blocking?â
The Power Triad indicators should feed directly into annual performance reviews and bonus decisions.
It is critical to track progress through movement and not only representation. While representation gives you a snapshot of where you are, movement indicates where you are heading. So, dig deeper. Instead of simply focusing on the percentage of women in senior roles in your organization right now, include indicators such as:
The reality is that organizations do not lack talented women.
The reality is that organizations do not lack talented women. What they lack are leadership systems that consistently recognize, reward, and retain them.
As artificial intelligence reshapes work, as industries confront demographic shifts and economic volatility, and as the skills required for leadership evolve rapidly, organizations that fail to modernize how leadership power is allocated will find themselves constrained by a narrow and increasingly fragile leadership bench.
Formalizing succession slates, access to executive feeder roles, and making sponsorship a leadership obligation are three strategic moves that will redress the balance systematically within your organization. Together they represent a Power Triad â one that will not only reverse the backslide weâre seeing on womenâs progress, but build deeper benches, expand your leadership market, and fortify your capacity to adapt and grow in an age marked by change, uncertainty, and volatility.
Womenâs progress to the most senior echelons of leadership has been stalled by systemic failures. You cannot fix a broken ladder by coaching the climbers. You fix it by rebuilding the ladder.
By adopting similar habits to those of elite athletes, leaders can perform at their best for longer. Olympians Matthijs BĂźchli and Susan Goldsworthy suggest ways to achieve your goals with less stress....
Audio available
AI-powered coaching tools help executives sharpen leadership, reveal blind spots, and enhance skills when combined with human expertise and frameworks....
Schindler CFO Carla De Geyseleer explains how todayâs CFO acts as a strategic co-pilot, uses sustainability to drive growth, and develops future finance leaders....
The fast-growing sector needs a unique leadership archetype to realize its full potential. After interviewing key players in the industry, senior executives at WittKieffer offer a blueprint for success....
Audio availableExplore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience