
Bias in the boardroom: Good or bad?
Of the many biases humans are prey to – such as anchoring bias, loss-aversion bias, status quo bias, and recency bias – confirmation bias can be most evident in the boardroom. But...

by Julia Binder Published January 23, 2026 in Brain Circuits • 4 min read
1. False. ESG is a framework for investors to assess “outside-in” risks. It asks: What environmental, social, or governance issues could impact our financial performance? As such, it’s critical but narrow in focus. Sustainability, by contrast, is “inside-out” value creation. It asks: Where do we leave our biggest mark on people and the planet? How can we turn that into long-term value? It’s broader, opportunity-driven, and anchored in strategy, innovation, and purpose. It’s not about avoiding risk – it’s about creating value.
2. False. Cutting carbon is critical for all businesses, but real sustainability demands a wider lens: planetary health, social equity, and strategy-level commitment.
3. True. In fact, truly sustainable business practice is profitable by definition. But, because returns from renewables, circularity, and regenerative agriculture typically accrue over three to 10 years, they tend not to show up in a 90-day results culture; hence, such future value is discounted – until it’s too late.
4. False. This is one of the most enduring myths around “green products.” In most cases, however, sustainability isn’t the problem. Green products that underperform or overcharge consumers won’t succeed. They are often more expensive to produce, but that does not mean businesses can pass all the extra cost onto the consumer. Instead, a simple shift from a relative to a fixed-margin pricing system, as shown in this Kearney article, can help solve the issue.
5. False. Yes, climate targets are being dropped, ESG funds are losing assets, and AI is stealing all the headlines as sustainability faces a combination of backlash, burnout, and boredom. But change is rarely linear. We’re actually hitting multiple S-curves of rapid progress right now: renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels, EVs have gone from niche to mainstream in Europe and China, and heat pumps, alternative proteins, regenerative agriculture, and circular business models are scaling fast and starting to revolutionize how we produce and consume – from repair and reuse to product-as-a-service.
Far from being dead, corporate sustainability is a strategic lever for value creation, resilience, and competitiveness. If you’re walking away from climate targets, your problem isn’t sustainability – it’s a failure to futureproof your business.

Professor of Business Transformation at IMD
Julia Katharina Binder, Professor of Business Transformation, is a renowned thought leader recognized on the 2022 Thinkers50 Radar list for her work at the intersection of sustainability and innovation. As Director of IMD’s Center for Sustainable and Inclusive Business, Binder is dedicated to leveraging IMD’s diverse expertise on sustainability topics to guide business leaders in discovering innovative solutions to contemporary challenges. At IMD, Binder serves as Program Director for Creating Value in the Circular Economy and teaches in key open programs including Transition to Business Leadership (TBL), and Leading Sustainable Business Transformation (LSBT). She is involved in the school’s EMBA and MBA programs, and contributes to IMD’s custom programs, crafting transformative learning journeys for clients globally.

March 24, 2026 • by Patrick Reinmoeller in Brain Circuits
Of the many biases humans are prey to – such as anchoring bias, loss-aversion bias, status quo bias, and recency bias – confirmation bias can be most evident in the boardroom. But...

March 19, 2026 • by Anna Erat in Brain Circuits
As workforces age, organizations must confront a critical question: how will extended lifespans reshape leadership, organizational strategy, and the very concept of a career? Anna Erat identifies four focus areas to sustain...

March 17, 2026 • by Jennifer Jordan in Brain Circuits
To transition into the boardroom, you need a brand, a unique board proposition, and a governance mindset - but you also need to consider the value you add and the cultural fit...

March 12, 2026 • by Simon J. Evenett, Oliver Jones in Brain Circuits
Research indicates that 14% of companies report net positive effects from political risks that disrupted competitors, creating market openings to capitalize on temporary dislocations and long-term shifts in global trade patterns. Simon J...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience