
Are you mired in meeting madness?
Since COVID-19, one trend has silently taken over the way we work. What used to be quick exchanges have become scheduled calls, and leaders and teams find themselves juggling double- or triple-bookings....

by Jennifer Jordan Published December 11, 2025 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
The gender stereotype of networking is that it is self-promoting behavior, deemed unacceptable in women. My research with colleagues at the University of Groningen found that leaders who actively engage in networking behavior are seen as more effective and considered to have more positive characteristics (such as communality and competence) than leaders who do not, regardless of their gender.
Women in leadership positions are often concerned that active networking behavior could be seen as inauthentic or nakedly ambitious. Again, our studies found that women were not seen as less authentic, even when they engaged in networking behavior that is stereotypically masculine, like accepting high-visibility projects. Moreover, when their networking behavior was perceived as authentic, sincere, and true to self, both men and women executives were rated as more suitable leaders by their peers.
Because agentic networking (such as accepting highly visible work assignments, joining committees to increase internal visibility, and engaging in new outreach initiatives when off the job) is commonly associated with men, women leaders can be reluctant to exhibit such public behaviors for fear of disapproval – but our research showed that women were not only seen as equally effective as men who actively networked, but were also believed to be more likable and more enjoyable to work with.
Women leaders are not viewed more negatively than men when they use stereotypically agentic or masculine strategies in networking. This is an essential point, since this behavior correlates strongly with career benefits such as promotions and higher pay. But be careful to use network strategies that are close to your comfort zone and avoid those that feel insincere to you; regardless of gender, networking should always be authentic.

Social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

March 31, 2026 • by Dorotea Brandin in Brain Circuits
Since COVID-19, one trend has silently taken over the way we work. What used to be quick exchanges have become scheduled calls, and leaders and teams find themselves juggling double- or triple-bookings....

March 26, 2026 • by Sophie Hazi, Arturo Pasquel in Brain Circuits
Considering a career transition? Begin by identifying your unique values and strengths. Sophi Hazi and Arturo Pasquel guide you through the process....

March 24, 2026 • by Patrick Reinmoeller in Brain Circuits
Of the many biases humans are prey to – such as anchoring bias, loss-aversion bias, status quo bias, and recency bias – confirmation bias can be most evident in the boardroom. But...

March 19, 2026 • by Anna Erat in Brain Circuits
As workforces age, organizations must confront a critical question: how will extended lifespans reshape leadership, organizational strategy, and the very concept of a career? Anna Erat identifies four focus areas to sustain...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience