
Do you know the ABC of Gen Z?
Assumptions about digital natives in the workplace often prevent leaders from building more meaningful connections....

by Jennifer Jordan Published December 11, 2025 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
The gender stereotype of networking is that it is self-promoting behavior, deemed unacceptable in women. My research with colleagues at the University of Groningen found that leaders who actively engage in networking behavior are seen as more effective and considered to have more positive characteristics (such as communality and competence) than leaders who do not, regardless of their gender.
Women in leadership positions are often concerned that active networking behavior could be seen as inauthentic or nakedly ambitious. Again, our studies found that women were not seen as less authentic, even when they engaged in networking behavior that is stereotypically masculine, like accepting high-visibility projects. Moreover, when their networking behavior was perceived as authentic, sincere, and true to self, both men and women executives were rated as more suitable leaders by their peers.
Because agentic networking (such as accepting highly visible work assignments, joining committees to increase internal visibility, and engaging in new outreach initiatives when off the job) is commonly associated with men, women leaders can be reluctant to exhibit such public behaviors for fear of disapproval – but our research showed that women were not only seen as equally effective as men who actively networked, but were also believed to be more likable and more enjoyable to work with.
Women leaders are not viewed more negatively than men when they use stereotypically agentic or masculine strategies in networking. This is an essential point, since this behavior correlates strongly with career benefits such as promotions and higher pay. But be careful to use network strategies that are close to your comfort zone and avoid those that feel insincere to you; regardless of gender, networking should always be authentic.

Social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour at IMD
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

20 hours ago • by Jackie Cooper in Brain Circuits
Assumptions about digital natives in the workplace often prevent leaders from building more meaningful connections....

February 26, 2026 • by Michael R. Wade in Brain Circuits
Workplace silos are a huge productivity inhibitor. Casper Herzberg, CEO of industrial software company AVEVA, tells Michael Wade how radical collaboration can create value....

February 25, 2026 • by Sara Ratti in Brain Circuits
For most companies, climate action has limited influence on executive decision-making. Here’s how boards can design compensation structures that motivate leaders to meet corporate climate ambitions. ...

February 24, 2026 • by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Our previous brain circuit on this subject explored what your inner child can do for you, such as take risks or look at a situation differently. Here are five ways to reconnect...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience