Firmenich: Juggling the short and the long term (Cartoon case)

The case examines how DNB Bank, Norway's largest financial services company, reshaped its growth strategy by focusing on startups and SMEs, a segment traditionally considered unprofitable. In 2013, DNB launched a bold SME strategy, deliberately choosing a gross approach to win new startups early in their life cycle rather than a net approach focused on the profitability of existing accounts. This strategy, enabled by a significant investment in digitalization and a cultural shift toward customer lifecycle engagement, generated exceptional results and by 2025, the SME segment delivered the highest return on allocated capital. The journey, however, was not linear. A European regulatory crackdown in 2019, following the Danske Bank money laundering scandal, forced DNB to shift its focus from growth to compliance. The bank reallocated 1,000 employees to KYC units, dismantling its startup-friendly onboarding process and causing customer acquisition to stall. As competitors advanced, DNB had to orchestrate a strategic Restart effort to rebuild its SME leadership. This involved launching superior digital tools, providing automated lending decisions within a minute, and renewing its customer-centric focus. By 2025, the recovery was well underway, with one in three Norwegian SMEs banking with DNB. The case challenges students to evaluate DNB's past choices, the critical balance between growth and compliance, and the future of SME banking as AI and digital agents transform customer interactions.

Las estrategias de economía circular y regeneración están transformando el crecimiento empresarial frente al cambio climático, la escasez de recursos y la tensión geopolítica, dentro de los límites del planeta.

Las economías emergentes impulsan una nueva era energética: de Brasil a India, la energía se convierte en ventaja competitiva y motor del crecimiento sostenible.

Novonesis CEO Ester Baiget shares how advanced tech and a unique ‘library of strengths’ are transforming food production and laundry solutions globally.

The case follows Kristin Hull, founder and CIO of Nia Impact Capital, a mission-driven investment firm in California, as she faces a pivotal decision in July 2025: Should she file a shareholder resolution against Tesla, Inc.? Hull and Nia have engaged Tesla for over five years on issues of human capital management, workplace equity and board oversight. In 2025, the stakes are higher. Tesla is facing mounting reputational, legal and operational risks, including civil rights litigation, governance controversies and product recalls, compounding the previous year's 53% decline in profits. Now, Hull must decide between two draft resolutions: one framed in the language of social justice, the other in terms of business efficiency and governance. A third option is to total withdraw from the engagement. This decision must be made in a shifting US political and regulatory context marked by heightened scrutiny of environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives and a national rollback of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) commitments. The polarized climate makes language and framing not just strategic choices but also existential ones: How can impact investors continue to advance their missions while maintaining legitimacy and influence in an increasingly hostile environment? Designed to mirror the complexity of real-world decision making, the case immerses students in an environment of competing pressures, contradictory information and media "noise." It reflects the paradoxes impact investors face: staying true to the mission vs. maintaining strategic influence; framing issues in values-based vs. efficiency-based language; and exercising leadership amid political backlash and reputational risk. The case is suitable for courses on sustainable finance, non-market strategy, governance and leadership. It challenges students to explore fiduciary duty, rethink the role of shareholder engagement, and consider how language and framing can serve as tools of influence in turbulent times.

From its origins as a manufacturer of hospital equipment for the Indian market, Thermax has grown into a multinational corporation operating in 90 countries, offering integrated solutions in heating, cooling, power generation, water treatment and recycling, air pollution control, and chemicals with a focus on ensuring clean air, clean energy and clean water. The founding family, which owns a 61% stake in the firm (the rest being publicly held), has steered the company toward helping speed the transition to renewable energies via the development of greener technologies. In addition, the family has shown unwavering commitment to social responsibility and philanthropic endeavors. The case features a detailed history of Thermax's evolution as a family business, with a particular focus on how the family has navigated the challenges of intra-family succession. The dilemmas faced by owner-managers as they hand over the reins of the family business, combined with the outsize impact of succession on the future performance of a business, have contributed to making succession the single most studied topic in family business research. The Thermax case study illustrates the varied forms succession can take over the course of four generations. It also explores the different ways family members can contribute to the family enterprise system via operational roles in the company as well as involvement in board governance, ownership governance and philanthropic work. The case is based on interviews with five members of the founding family, all of whom hold (or have held) executive and/or operational roles in the company. The dynamics of intra-family succession form the crux of the case. Since the company was created in 1966, each generation has brought different leadership qualities and competencies to their respective roles and has contributed to making Thermax a leading conglomerate in the energy and environment space.

The case looks at the fundamental challenges, tensions and opportunities associated with an internally run venture as opposed to an externally funded startup or spin-off company. It discusses the genesis and context of Kontor, an internal venture funded by Resmed Inc. Resmed is an S&P 500 MedTech company. At the time of the case, May 2024, Resmed was also experiencing increasing external competitive threats and pressure on its margin due to GLP-1s, a class of medicines. Kontor is an internal venture at Resmed trying to find its way through turbulent times. Kontor applies Resmed's class-leading comfort and fit technology to the AR/VR space, thus making these devices more comfortable for the user. Kontor has been running for several years and Erika, the case protagonist, is the newly appointed general manager. The current turbulent situation is causing the executives to question investment in the internal venture. Erika must deal with many challenges, but the fundamental question is whether Kontor will create the most value for Resmed as an internal venture or whether it should be spun out and in what manner. The case compares five strategic possibilities: 1) Spinning out the business and running Kontor independently of Resmed with external investors, 2) keeping Kontor wholly owned by Resmed but, run it off-balance sheet, 3) sell Kontor to a strategic buyer, 4) keep running Kontor internally with operational assistance from Resmed Inc, or 5) wait and see how the venture goes without making a decision in the near term thus preserving all options.

How one family in the life sciences industry leverages business, strategic investments, and nonprofit initiatives to improve health.

A climate of pervasive uncertainty is paralyzing decision-making. Here's what leaders can learn about survival and resilience from multi-generational, family-run businesses.

This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The video B case features interviews with three Vanzetti Engineering executives: the marketing director, the CEO and owner and the chief commercial officer. With the shrinking of the automobile industry, the company has had to reposition itself in other industrial sectors where it is significantly smaller than the customers. Vanzetti Engineering embraced some of the codes of luxury branding according to what suited it and ignored others. The company discovered that although it was focused mostly on creating functional value, it had to dwell much more on emotional and societal value creation. The process of brand elevation required a complete cultural transformation, and one of the lessons from the case is that a brand is not a slogan but a way of being and of delivering value.