How to build up your courage, one step at a time
Workplace bravery is too often seen through the lens of a few heroic whistleblowers. But choosing small everyday acts of courage is a skill that can be learned by everyone, writes Jim...
Some of you might remember the movie Moneyball, with Brad Pitt playing Billy Beane, general manager of Major League Baseball’s Oakland Athletics. Entering the 2002 season, the underfunded team loses three of its biggest stars to wealthier rivals, leaving Beane with big shoes to fill but no real spending power.
Early on, maverick team advisor Peter Brand, a Yale economics graduate, tells Beane that all clubs make the same mistakes when scouting talent. The goal is not to buy players, but to buy wins. And to buy wins, you need runs. The implication is strikingly simple. Stop paying for reputations. Start paying for what produces runs.
Brand’s philosophy, that statistics never lie, faces its ultimate test in a pivotal scene, when Beane and a room of old-fashioned scouts debate acquiring Scott Hatteberg. Hatteberg is a veteran catcher with irreversible nerve damage in his elbow. He can no longer throw. Traditional baseball has written him off as damaged goods.
Economics, at its core, is the science of optimal resource allocation. Given scarce resources, how do we deploy them to maximize outcomes?
But Beane and Brand read the statistics differently. They see an exceptional ability to get safely “on base” when batting – a critical factor in a team’s ability to prolong an innings and accumulate runs. They do not see a broken catcher. They see an undervalued asset that they can actually afford. They sign him cheaply. The scouts push back hard, but Beane cuts them off, again and again, almost stubbornly, with a single criterion: “He gets on base.” The only thing that matters is whether a player avoids making an out.
Economics, at its core, is the science of optimal resource allocation. Given scarce resources, how do we deploy them to maximize outcomes? What Moneyball illustrates, elegantly and with a touch of humor, is how organizations can be guilty of optimizing the wrong variables. They invest in inputs that look valuable rather than in outputs that drive results.
By reframing the problem in light of their constraints, Beane and Brand transformed how clubs should allocate budgets. Their pivot to focus on a player’s ability to get “on base” reframed the way talent was evaluated.
During the 2002 season, the Oakland Athletics won 20 games in a row, setting an American League record. The question for the rest of us is clear: are we paying for players, or are we buying runs?
August 7, 2026 • by Jim R. Detert in Leadership
Workplace bravery is too often seen through the lens of a few heroic whistleblowers. But choosing small everyday acts of courage is a skill that can be learned by everyone, writes Jim...

August 4, 2026 • by Elisa Alt , Katrin Heucher , Sara Soderstrom in Leadership
Valuable social and environmental initiatives can come from anywhere. Elisa Alt, Katrin Heucher, and Sara Soderstrom offer a research-backed roadmap for leaders to activate the ‘change agents’ already on the payroll....
August 4, 2026 • by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Leadership
Diagnose team doubts and turn uncertainty into trust. A practical guide for new leaders to identify causes and win buy-in with calm, strategic steps....
July 31, 2026 • by Graham Clark in Leadership
Learn why a CEO-to-be must trust their team and the process. A coach helps Ian shift from micromanagement to collaborative leadership that unlocks performance...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience