How should CEOs respond to the era of hyper-vigilance
CEOs face greater scrutiny than ever. Retreating from the speaking spotlight is no solution. IMD’s Jean-François Manzoni explains how CEOs should talk with trust and integrity....
Strategy
Get on base: Buy runs not reputations
The lesson of Moneyball is simple: stop paying for reputation and start investing in what produces results.
Some of you might remember the movie Moneyball, with Brad Pitt playing Billy Beane, general manager of Major League Baseball’s Oakland Athletics. Entering the 2002 season, the underfunded team loses three of its biggest stars to wealthier rivals, leaving Beane with big shoes to fill but no real spending power.
Early on, maverick team advisor Peter Brand, a Yale economics graduate, tells Beane that all clubs make the same mistakes when scouting talent. The goal is not to buy players, but to buy wins. And to buy wins, you need runs. The implication is strikingly simple. Stop paying for reputations. Start paying for what produces runs.
Brand’s philosophy, that statistics never lie, faces its ultimate test in a pivotal scene, when Beane and a room of old-fashioned scouts debate acquiring Scott Hatteberg. Hatteberg is a veteran catcher with irreversible nerve damage in his elbow. He can no longer throw. Traditional baseball has written him off as damaged goods.
Economics, at its core, is the science of optimal resource allocation. Given scarce resources, how do we deploy them to maximize outcomes?
But Beane and Brand read the statistics differently. They see an exceptional ability to get safely “on base” when batting – a critical factor in a team’s ability to prolong an innings and accumulate runs. They do not see a broken catcher. They see an undervalued asset that they can actually afford. They sign him cheaply. The scouts push back hard, but Beane cuts them off, again and again, almost stubbornly, with a single criterion: “He gets on base.” The only thing that matters is whether a player avoids making an out.
Economics, at its core, is the science of optimal resource allocation. Given scarce resources, how do we deploy them to maximize outcomes? What Moneyball illustrates, elegantly and with a touch of humor, is how organizations can be guilty of optimizing the wrong variables. They invest in inputs that look valuable rather than in outputs that drive results.
By reframing the problem in light of their constraints, Beane and Brand transformed how clubs should allocate budgets. Their pivot to focus on a player’s ability to get “on base” reframed the way talent was evaluated.
During the 2002 season, the Oakland Athletics won 20 games in a row, setting an American League record. The question for the rest of us is clear: are we paying for players, or are we buying runs?
Related
When in Rome, be yourself: Career advice from the experts
Explore career advice from IMD experts: align strengths with your purpose, play the long game, and make authentic, impactful choices....
Three tips to start using AI as a communications sounding board
Learn how AI-powered feedback can boost executive coaching: three concrete tips to improve tone, word choice, and cultural insight....
From space to the workplace, collaboration is making us more liberal
Can collaboration in the workplace reshape ideology? This IMD study shows diverse teams foster inclusivity and better strategic decisions....
Learn Brain Circuits
Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
Explore Leadership
What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
Join Membership
Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.