Carbon accounting: Learnings from the governance journey
How companies understand their sustainability-related governance may hold the key to meeting climate goals and thriving in a net-zero economy ...
9 July 2021 • by Karl Schmedders in Leading in Turbulent Times
‘The E and the S are competing for attention, and the greener we go, the more social harm we need to account for,’ says IMD Professor of Finance Karl Schmedders....
The last few years have seen increasing hype around sustainability and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing. We have witnessed real change – some banks have stopped the financing of new coal activities, for example – but we have also observed cases of “greenwashing”. Many financial intermediaries are simply not living up to the promises made in their colorful brochures.
This webinar with Professor of Finance Karl Schmedders reviews the reasons for the current hype, taking a critical look at both real and fake initiatives. He evaluates the current state of ESG investing and attempts to provide an outlook to “just transition” in response to recent events and policy measures.
The Paris Agreement calls explicitly to mobilize climate finance from a wide variety of sources. For sustainable finance that includes investments for climate mitigation (reducing emissions) and climate adaptation (adapting to the adverse effects and reduce the impacts of a changing climate).
Yet since most of the world’s countries have ratified the Paris Agreement, annual total CO2 emissions have skyrocketed. As a result, temperatures are increasing, sea levels are rising, and glaciers are melting.
“Sir Nicholas Stern, economist at the London School of Economics, says climate change is a result of the greatest market failure the world has ever seen,” says Schmedders, “while researcher Richard Tol acknowledges it is the mother of all externalities.”
Focusing on the E in ESG, Schmedders says the problem with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is that responsible economic agents have no incentive to reduce them and do not bear the cost. Using the example of global cement production, which uses vast amounts of energy to heat limestone, he says:
“As the adverse effects of GHG are external to markets, markets do not have to account for them. And so cement production continues to increase despite its massive carbon footprint. For example, China used more cement in the three years from 2011 to 2013 (6.6 gigatons) than the US did (4.5 gigatons) in the entire 20th century.”
With the move toward less pollution, some sectors will see big shifts and higher costs of doing business.
“What we are seeing now is that policymakers, regulators, and governments are changing the incentives for the economic agents, and us – the consumer – through policies that affect market prices,” Schmedders says.
Another worry is stranded assets – investments that have already been made but can no longer earn an economic return.
“California’s almond farmers produce more than 80% of the world’s crop and are currently dealing with stranded assets as their water allowance is decreasing. They have been reduced to cutting down perfectly good trees to avoid using too much of their limited water supply,” says Schmedders.
An expert in computational economics and the effect of external factors on finance, Schmedders takes a deep dive into the transition risk – the harm done in “going green” – that is currently resulting from regulation, innovation, and evolving consumer and business preferences.
“Financial markets need to price in the effects of policy responses, accounting for externalities,” he says, noting they have been long disregarded by business as they fall outside market effects.
He believes more cooperation is needed on a global level to ensure a just transition mechanism.
“How can we take money from rich countries and help the world in the transition?” he asks. “Just transition is not just about Polish or Alsatian coalminers losing their livelihoods, but the collapse of entire industries and livelihoods all around the world.”
It is only by understanding climate change as an externality, Schmedders insists, that we can understand the physical risk and the transition risk involved in ESG investing.
More than 70% of participants agreed, voting that ESG deserves more importance and will be critical for many years to come.
Professor of Finance at IMD
Karl Schmedders is Professor of Finance at IMD. In his research, he applies numerical solution techniques to complex economic and financial models, shedding light on relevant market issues and industry problems. He is also Director of IMD’s new online certification course for structured investment products in partnership with Swiss company Leonteq, teaches in the Advanced Management Concepts (AMC) and Executive MBA programs, and is an advisor on International Consulting Projects in the MBA program.
16 November 2023 • by Ralf W. Seifert, Richard Markoff, Alexander Schmidt in Sustainability • 6 min read
How companies understand their sustainability-related governance may hold the key to meeting climate goals and thriving in a net-zero economy ...
15 November 2023 • by Frédéric Dalsace, Goutam Challagalla in Sustainability • 7 min read
The future lies in creating positive value equations for customers, showcasing how sustainability enhances traditional product benefits....
13 November 2023 • by Edoardo Chiarotti in Sustainability • 7 min read
As temperatures hit 53C in Furnace Creek in California’s Death Valley, it’s clear we need to act – and fast. Edoardo Chiarotti argues that companies need to pay a ‘vegetation debt’ to...
8 November 2023 • by Camilla Erencin, Simon J. Evenett, Alexander Gruber, Felix Reitz in Sustainability • 6 min read
With society facing a number of critical challenges, such as the transition to a low-carbon economy, digital disruption, and aging populations, demands are growing on businesses to divert some of their economic...
6 November 2023 • by Sudhanshu Sarronwala in Sustainability • 9 min read
Focusing on a company’s ecological and social impact as well as its economic performance has yielded mixed results. However, there is increasing evidence that even legacy companies are now making positive strides....
6 November 2023 • by Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 7 min read
The vast majority of plans are not worth the paper they are written on, recent research shows. A comprehensive path toward net zero should address Scope 3 emissions, incorporate carbon offsetting, and...
26 October 2023 • by John Elkington in Sustainability • 12 min read
What’s a regenerative business model? It starts with designing companies as if we mean to stay on this planet....
18 October 2023 • by Gabriele Rosani , Mattia Vettorello in Sustainability • 6 min read
Systematically wearing the hats of all stakeholders can ensure their perspectives are taken into consideration when making decisions....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience