The coaching journey
Sam and the coach start by acknowledging the positives in Sam’s determination and commitment to her team and to her organization, and the courage that it takes to be a voice of dissent – something that has proved valuable both to Sam and to the organization at different times. From here, the coach encourages Sam to explore some of the risks that might come from taking on every cause and fighting every battle that comes her way.
Sam tends to react with enormous spirit and conviction – and to do so on behalf of other people who come to her with a problem or complaint, or to take up a cause no one else has the courage to pick up. Working with the coach, she comes to see that responding passionately to every challenge, and a willingness to fight even losing battles, can come at a cost to her emotional energy, her reputation with other leaders, and even some of her relationships with colleagues.
Working with the coach, Sam sees that these responses are visceral: they come from her belly and are expressed often before she has taken the time to reflect on the situation fully. Sam’s coach suggests a few simple mechanisms to help her manage emotions and “choose her battles” more effectively.
The first is breathing. When faced with a dilemma or asked to intervene on behalf of her team or a colleague, she is to take three deep breaths before speaking or reacting. This will give her a chance to pause, think, and become calm before choosing an appropriate response. The second mechanism is similar. When confronted by a problem or an issue that she finds upsetting in some way, Sam is to ask for some “time out” to go away and digest the information – buying herself time to ask more questions and reflect on the issue before deciding how (or whether at all) to react.
Finally, Sam’s coach introduces a framework that Sam can use to determine whether to respond to issues or not. The framework is a set of questions that she must ask herself. Doing this not only helps her figure out her response but also forces her to marshal more cognitive (and less emotional or visceral) processes to help keep knee-jerk reactions in check. The questions are:
- What do I stand to gain and what do I risk in responding to this situation?
- How much might I risk damaging relationships with those who might be against me?
- Why has this person asked me to intervene, and what could they do that they are not doing now?
- Do I have a chance of winning this fight? And if not, is it worth what I’m risking?