Is AI scaling your worst habits?
Could AI mirror your organization’s worst habits? Five actionable steps turn human systems into robust infrastructure with clear values and governance....
by Robert Hooijberg, Tania Lennon Published August 6, 2026 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
Many organizations hitch their wagon to younger generations – digital natives with open minds, fresh perspectives, and all the other indicators we typically associate with potential. At the same time, we tend to default to outmoded assumptions about more mature employees: they no longer have what it takes to disrupt, innovate, or make the waves the organization needs to sustain competitive advantage.
Check whether these biases are baked into the organization by asking these questions:
The key to making this work is to abandon a top-down assignment approach and enable creative solutions.
Give the same business problem to one team in their 20s and another in their 50s. Give each team one day to identify the root cause of the problem, explore the variables, devise a solution, and present their findings. These interventions should be fun. More importantly, they’ll generate different perspectives that broaden the range of possible solutions.
Provide regular think-tank opportunities for older workers to consider a challenge the business is facing. Let seasoned employees bring their experience to bear on the problem and see what insights emerge. The key to making this work is to abandon a top-down assignment approach and enable creative solutions for what the organization might do differently.
AI is driving efficiencies and delivering faster wins across functions, including learning and development and HR. While this may improve productivity, it also removes opportunities for younger workers to develop the complex mental models and interpersonal skills that come with practice and experience. Older workers can engage in mentoring, shadowing, coaching, and action learning with younger colleagues to fill this gap.
Businesses that challenge outdated assumptions and standardized approaches to talent identification and development will be best placed to attract and develop high-potential teams in the disruptive age of AI.
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Robert Hooijberg is Professor of Organizational Behavior at IMD. His areas of special interest are leadership, negotiations, team building, digital transformation, and organizational culture. Before joining IMD in September 2000, Professor Hooijberg taught at Rutgers University in their MBA and Executive MBA programs in New Jersey, Singapore, and Beijing. He is Program Director of the Breakthrough Program for Senior Executives and the Negotiating for Value Creation course.
Executive Director of the Strategic Talent Development initiative
Tania Lennon leads the Strategic Talent team for IMD. She is an expert on future-ready talent development, including innovative assessment methods to maximize the impact of talent development on individual and organizational performance. Lennon is a “pracademic”, blending a strong research orientation with evidence-based practice in talent development and assessment.
October 1, 2026 • by Susanne May in Brain Circuits
Could AI mirror your organization’s worst habits? Five actionable steps turn human systems into robust infrastructure with clear values and governance....
September 30, 2026 • by Dorotea Brandin in Brain Circuits
Use the AAA framework to assess tasks and projects: 1–10 scores per criterion guide smarter, calmer workplace decisions....
September 29, 2026 • by Olivia Lichtenstein in Brain Circuits
Discover the otrovert: a new archetype who sees what others miss, asks tough questions, and helps break through groupthink....
September 24, 2026 • by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Unlock motivation with five small actions: boost focus, reduce procrastination, and finish tasks faster....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience