Europe AI teardown: strengths, adequacies and dangerous gaps
Discover Europe's AI strengths across voice, translation, video, and defense—and the critical gaps slowing adoption and sovereignty....
Innovation
China’s innovation paradox: What lies behind its competitive edge?
What makes Chinese companies so fast, cost-competitive, and increasingly sophisticated? The answer lies as much in how they compete and manage their businesses as in the technologies they develop.
Rapid read:
- China’s innovation paradox challenges conventional thinking. Despite weak domestic demand and mounting economic pressures, the country is investing heavily in future capabilities. Whether this emphasis on transformation over short-term performance will pay off remains uncertain.
- Fierce competition creates winners, but not necessarily profits. China’s swarm competition produces companies capable of delivering quality products at remarkably low costs. Yet squeezed margins are also pushing many to seek growth and profitability overseas.
- The most valuable lessons may lie beyond the technology. China’s advances in AI, robotics, and energy attract attention, but understanding how its companies organize themselves, make decisions, and achieve speed and cost efficiency may offer executives more transferable insights.
China’s current economic outlook presents a puzzle. Its property market has been in a prolonged downturn, consumers are spending cautiously, and local governments are struggling with debt. An aging population is adding to concerns about the country’s longer-term growth prospects.
Yet look at what Chinese companies are doing. From electric vehicles and robotics to AI and biotechnology, they are developing increasingly sophisticated technologies, often at a speed and cost that international competitors struggle to match. How can an economy facing such significant challenges continue to produce companies that are becoming more competitive on the global stage?
China’s K-shaped economy
Some economists describe China as a K-shaped economy. One part is advancing rapidly through investment in technology and innovation, while the other is struggling with problems that have accumulated over many years. Shenzhen’s remarkable transformation, for example, illustrates only part of China’s economic story.
But the pressures facing China also help explain why it is investing so heavily in future technologies. Its population is aging, and its workforce is shrinking. Robotics, automation, and AI, are not simply opportunities to develop new industries. They are also ways of responding to a growing demographic challenge.
Energy is another important part of this picture. These technologies require substantial amounts of electricity, making access to reliable, affordable power essential. China’s energy ambitions are not simply about sustainability. Energy independence is another major priority, which helps explain why China is expanding renewable capacity while continuing to invest in coal, nuclear power, and other energy sources.
There is also a tension between performing today and transforming for tomorrow. China is investing heavily in future capabilities, even as parts of its economy struggle. Will that approach work? Nobody knows. Robotics and AI cannot solve weak consumer demand or local government debt, and not every investment will pay off.
China’s economic model is different, and understanding its innovation trajectory requires recognizing both its strengths and vulnerabilities.
Within a few decades, rapidly expanding markets had attracted an extraordinary number of entrepreneurs.
When competitors swarm
China’s distinctive approach to competition has its roots in an entrepreneurial economy that is still relatively young. Economic reforms began in 1978, Shenzhen became one of its first special economic zones in the early 1980s, and China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 accelerated its integration into global manufacturing and trade.
Within a few decades, rapidly expanding markets had attracted an extraordinary number of entrepreneurs. The result was a form of competition quite different from what many Western businesses are accustomed to.
Imagine an entrepreneur who identifies an opportunity and secures funding. In Silicon Valley, the immediate question might be what makes the idea unique. What is its competitive advantage? How can that advantage be protected?
In China, another hundred entrepreneurs may see exactly the same opportunity and pursue it. They might change a feature for the customer, improve the design, or offer a slightly lower price. Before long, hundreds of companies are competing to satisfy essentially the same customer need.
This is swarm competition.
From the outside, this can look terribly inefficient. Hundreds of companies chasing the same customers, many of them destined to fail. But the companies that survive have learned to bring costs down while improving quality and customer satisfaction. Their products may not always represent the most radical technological breakthroughs, but they are products people want to buy.
When hundreds of businesses compete aggressively on price, margins come under pressure.
The problem with winning
There’s a catch to all this competition. It produces highly capable companies, but it doesn’t necessarily produce profitable ones.
When hundreds of businesses compete aggressively on price, margins come under pressure. Even companies with excellent products may struggle to make money at home. Having survived such intense competition, however, they may be well placed to challenge established competitors in international markets.
It is tempting to see China’s international expansion primarily as a geopolitical strategy. But many Chinese companies are looking overseas for a much simpler reason: they need to make money.
This does not mean geopolitics is irrelevant. Treating Chinese businesses as instruments of a single national strategy, however, risks overlooking the economic incentives shaping their decisions.
Shape what's next
Strategy programs
The future won’t wait for your strategy to catch up
Explore programsThe innovation that’s harder to see
Some of China’s most interesting innovations may have little to do with the products themselves. They concern how value is created across companies, and how different technologies and services work together.
Consider something as ordinary as ordering noodles in Shenzhen. A customer can speak to an app, ask for their favorite dish, and have it delivered 20 minutes later. No need to choose a restaurant, enter an address, or arrange payment.
The interesting part isn’t the noodles. It’s everything happening behind the scenes. An AI agent understands the customer’s preferences, selects a restaurant, arranges payment, and coordinates delivery, drawing on an ecosystem of companies, technologies, and services.
The coordination behind such services is one form of innovation that is easy to overlook. Another lies inside the companies themselves, in the way they are organized and managed.
The famous China speed has increasingly less to do with lower cost labor and
supply.
Innovation starts with management
The famous China speed has increasingly less to do with lower cost labor and supply. Many companies in China are realizing that the way a company is managed has a direct impact on its costs and speed. How many layers of approval does a new idea need to pass through? How much freedom do employees have to make decisions? And how quickly can the business respond when competitors introduce something better?
A company can invest heavily in AI and still be slow to make decisions. Technology alone won’t make a business more agile if the way it is managed remains unchanged.
We often attribute Chinese companies’ speed to national culture or government support. But neither explanation tells us much about what happens inside these businesses, or why some consistently outperform others.
Companies such as Huawei and Haier have been experimenting with how they manage their businesses, and organizational processes. That is worth studying just as closely as their products. It is easy to admire a new electric vehicle, robot, or AI application. Understanding the management practices that made its development possible requires looking much deeper into the company.
Of course, there is no single Chinese management model. The country’s businesses operate under very different incentives and expectations.
State-owned enterprises often have different objectives from privately owned technology companies. In sectors such as banking, healthcare, and energy, their primary role is to maintain economic stability and ensure essential services continue to function. That does not mean state-owned companies cannot be competitive – some, including in shipbuilding, have developed considerable strengths.
Nor should China’s private-sector innovation be understood as entirely state-directed. Entrepreneurs operate within an ecosystem that includes private investment, foreign capital, and intense commercial competition.
The lesson is not to copy China's innovation model, but to understand what makes it work.
Look beyond the technology
Not everything that makes Chinese companies competitive can be replicated elsewhere. Their capabilities have developed under particular economic conditions, and the pressures facing China remain substantial.
But there is plenty to learn from how these businesses operate. The next time a Chinese company unveils an impressive new product, consider what went into developing it. How did the company move so quickly? How did it keep costs down? What management decisions made the difference?
The lesson is not to copy China’s innovation model, but to understand what makes it work. Behind every impressive new technology are decisions about competition, cost, speed, and management. Those are the lessons worth studying.
Authors
Related
True or false? Digital ecosystems
Uncover what truly drives value in digital ecosystems: debunk myths and learn governance, data practices, and collaboration strategies...
Tricky decision? Time to get out the scales
Use the AAA framework to assess tasks and projects: 1–10 scores per criterion guide smarter, calmer workplace decisions....
Radical federalism: The way to tackle the AI velocity problem
Question central planning: why a unit-focused hybrid approach may outperform both centralized control and chaotic AI adoption....
Learn Brain Circuits
Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
Explore Leadership
What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
Join Membership
Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.