In an era of rising economic nationalism and intensifying rivalries, business leaders with extensive cross-border operations must develop sharper agility and foresight. Their ability to make informed decisions in this volatile environment hinges on the strength of their so-called geopolitical radar – their capacity to effectively track and proactively assess these shifting dynamics.
This requires a fundamental shift in mindset from relying on backward-looking, experience-driven assessments of geopolitical risks to embracing a more forward-looking tracking of geopolitical dynamics, combined with rigorous scenario planning.
This white paper, the result of collaboration between IMD, Boston Consulting Group and the World Economic Forum, provides a status report on how firms are enhancing their detection, understanding and assessment of the many geopolitical factors that have emerged over the past decade.
Ships and airplanes need radars – so do international businesses.
Focus on the urgency of present events can mask deeper insights into geopolitical drivers and trends with a more material impact on risks and opportunities.
US-China relations and security-related geopolitical factors are top-of-mind for the corporate executives interviewed.
There’s no one-size-fits-all solution in terms of how companies implement and operationalize their geopolitical radar and sonar.
The report highlights six commercial payoffs resulting from better navigation of geopolitical currents. Companies with significant cross-border operations have a vested interest in strengthening their capacity to understand both the risks and opportunities presented by unfolding geopolitical dynamics.
Building an effective geopolitical radar and sonar can lead to big wins and performance gains over the short, medium and long term.
These companies are both publicly listed and private. They share a common characteristic: a significant cross-border, multi-jurisdictional, global commercial footprint and therefore a vested interest in an open world economy.
Done right, this critical capability could itself become a source of competitive advantage and competence.
Simon J. Evenett
Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy, International Institute for Management Development (IMD), Co-Chair, Global Future Council on Trade and Investment, World Economic Forum
Cristián Rodriguez Chiffelle
Partner and Director, Trade, Investment and Geopolitics, Boston Consulting Group
Simon Lacey
Head, Digital Trade and Geopolitics, World Economic Forum
As President Trump begins his term in office, sweeping executive orders and long-term policy initiatives are set to redefine the global business landscape. Businesses and global markets are bracing for transformative changes aimed at reshaping domestic and international priorities.
IMD’s online Geopolitics Series: Navigating America’s New Direction program is a four-part series providing a deep dive into four pivotal areas: trade policy, energy transitions, digital regulation, and tax reform.
If you’re looking to deepen your knowledge of the geoeconomic environment, learn to navigate uncertainty with confidence, and turn disruption into advantage, click below to find out more.
The mention of geopolitics leads many to ask how company strategies are being reformulated to capitalize on what’s left of globalization. But this overlooks a critical prior question: what’s the best way for firms to track and assess geopolitical developments in the first place? For that, firms must build an effective geopolitical radar says Simon J. Evenett.
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience