Business people in a boardroom

Brain Circuits

Do your leadership programs lack micro-experiments?

Published November 5, 2026 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read

Insight alone rarely changes deeply ingrained behaviors. Here’s how to help leaders translate learning into lasting change by testing new approaches in real situations.

The gap between insight and behavior

Leadership development programs are effective at helping leaders see themselves more clearly. But seeing a behavior and changing it are not the same: many leaders leave a program with genuine insight into what’s holding them back – yet, when they return to work, the pressures and habits that shaped their success reassert themselves with surprising speed.

The missing step

What closes the gap between insight and behavior is something simpler than another commitment or framework: a micro-experiment. This is a single, specific, observable act of trying something different in one situation, designed to generate evidence about what actually happens.

It is not a goal or resolution in disguise. “I will be more present in my meetings” is a goal. It has no specific behavior and no way to know whether you did it. A micro-experiment addressing the same underlying concern might sound like this: “In my next meeting with my VP of sales, I’ll ask one question I’d normally answer myself and notice what I want to say while they’re talking and what happens in the conversation after I hold back.”

This action commits you to a specific behavior in a specific situation. It tells you what to attend to, externally and internally. It’s small enough to risk yet produces evidence you lacked about what triggers your behavior, what happens when you interrupt it, what your team does with the space when you leave it open, and what your organization actually rewards when you behave differently.

The goal is not immediate self-correction but learning.

What makes an experiment work

Four criteria distinguish a useful experiment from another resolution:

  • It must be specific enough that you know whether you did it.
  • It must be connected to a pattern you have identified in yourself, not a virtue you’d like to acquire.
  • It must be observable, which means you can report what happened, including what happened inside you, before and after.
  • It must be sufficiently low-stakes that you can run it without putting the work at risk.

Designed this way, an experiment shifts the leader’s stance from discipline to curiosity. The goal is not immediate self-correction but learning. Where a commitment asks the leader to muster willpower at the moment the old pattern fires, an experiment asks them to investigate the situation, not correct themselves.

Checklist

Ask yourself the following questions to assess whether your leadership programs are changing or reinforcing ingrained behavioral patterns:

  • Do our programs end with insight and commitment?
  • Are we giving our leaders another set of frameworks they understand but cannot act on?
  • Is the investment in our programs yielding the returns we expected?
  • Do our incentives and expectations reward behavior that our leaders are seeking to change?
  • What would a structured experimentation phase, owned by the leader and supported by the organization, look like?

Key takeaway

Good leadership development programs should include a structured experimentation phase, owned by the leader and supported by the organization, in which the insight from the program is translated into a sequence of small experiments run in the leader’s actual life over the following months. Supported by both the leader and the organization, such experiments translate learning into lasting behavioral change.

Authors

Chloé Christopoulos

Chloé Christopoulos

Executive coach & Leadership consultant

Chloé Christopoulos is an executive coach and leadership consultant with over 20 years of experience. She partners with leaders navigating complex transitions, helping them build trust, unlock growth, and lead with clarity. Based in Switzerland, she works with clients globally.

Michael Watkins

Professor of Leadership and Organizational Change

Michael D Watkins is Professor of Leadership and Organizational Change at IMD, and author of The First 90 Days, Master Your Next Move, Predictable Surprises, and 12 other books on leadership and negotiation. His book, The Six Disciplines of Strategic Thinking, explores how executives can learn to think strategically and lead their organizations into the future. A Thinkers 50-ranked management influencer and recognized expert in his field, his work features in HBR Guides and HBR’s 10 Must Reads on leadership, teams, strategic initiatives, and new managers. Over the past 20 years, he has used his First 90 Days® methodology to help leaders make successful transitions, both in his teaching at IMD, INSEAD, and Harvard Business School, where he gained his PhD in decision sciences, as well as through his private consultancy practice Genesis Advisers. At IMD, he directs the First 90 Days open program for leaders taking on challenging new roles and co-directs the Transition to Business Leadership (TBL) executive program for future enterprise leaders, as well as the Program for Executive Development.

Related

Learn Brain Circuits

Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
 
Read more 

Explore Leadership

What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
 
Read more

Join Membership

Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.
 
Sign up

Log in or register to enjoy the full experience

Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience