Committed to decarbonization? ‘The playing field is set to level’
What are the key takeaways for businesses – large and small – from COP28?...
9 June 2021 • by James E. Henderson in Leading in Turbulent Times
The once popular model of having a high-level management team develop a strategy which is then communicated to the rest of the organization is quickly becoming archaic. A truly inclusive strategy is...
Before one can strive for inclusiveness, it is important to understand what engagement looks like. “Participating means just asking for information but engagement means actually eliciting opinions on the critical choices facing the organization and including them in the whole process,” explains IMD Strategy Professor James Henderson.
But this level of inclusion has certain risks which mean even as companies transform their strategy process, there are a lot of fears and hesitations experienced by top executives. In Henderson’s webinar session he asked participants if they were an incoming CEO and presented with a new strategy from a team that had worked for a year but was only developed with high levels of input, how they would proceed. 57% said they would seek input from a wider cross-section of employees but still a limited contingent of critical stakeholders.
Some of the fears surrounding full inclusion include not wanting to slow down the process, worry that it will create expectations that if not met could actually cause employee disengagement and disappointment, and concern that it could even backfire by exposing a majority bias which alienates some part of the employee population.
However, done correctly, the benefits of full inclusion outweigh these fears.
Looking at the case study of Roche Diagnostics, CPS, which faced this dilemma, Henderson demonstrated what it looks like to strive for full inclusion in the strategy process.
Roche’s leadership team had spent a year looking at possible strategy choices and formulated a plan. Then the company’s incoming CEO, Thomas Schinecker, noticed that the budget might not support the number of projects planned, so he opted to seek organizational wide input before moving forward. Under Schinecker, all employees were invited to participate in strategy workshops, with roughly 50% actually engaging in the process. Using heavy touch digital tracking 11,300 ideas were collected, consolidated, and reported back to the leadership team.
The level of employee engagement was so high at Roche, they continued to repeat this exercise at broader levels. Schinecker says the key for executives is to let go. “If you have faith in the power of the people, they will come up with something brilliant,” he encouraged.
Furthermore, the results gave the strategy team a lot of granularity in terms of their choices. The company’s head of strategy indicated that people didn’t seem to mind how their inputs were used but they were excited about being part of the process. There is a lot of research to indicate this is a common phenomenon: if people feel the process was fair, they are satisfied with the results. So, despite the risks, it is worth the effort to include everyone.
Professor of Strategic Management at IMD
James E. Henderson is Professor of Strategic Management at IMD, Program Co-Director of the Leading Sustainable Business Transformation program, and Program Director of the Strategic Partnership course. He helps companies achieve and sustain their competitive advantage either at a business unit, corporate, or global level through directing custom specific executive programs, facilitating strategy workshops, or teaching MBAs and executives.
14 December 2023 • by Natalia Olynec, Arturo Bris, Salvatore Cantale, Knut Haanaes, Julia Binder in Sustainability • 6 min read
What are the key takeaways for businesses – large and small – from COP28?...
8 December 2023 in Sustainability • 6 min read • Podcast available
Climate finance is the hottest topic on the table when it comes to doing something tangible about climate change. We urgently need to propagate the “hows” around investing in positive values....
5 December 2023 in Sustainability • 5 min read
The transition to a greener future needs to happen fast. What does that have to do with gender diversity?...
4 December 2023 • by Salvatore Cantale, Andrea Cantobelli in Sustainability • 8 min read
The energy landscape has evolved into a complex network of choices and implications for business. What should companies consider when selecting their energy sources? ...
2 December 2023 • by Arturo Bris in Sustainability • 5 min read
Investing in decarbonization involves trade-offs between risk and return, so why are we pretending, otherwise asks Arturo Bris, who spoke in a panel on the topic at COP28 in Dubai. ...
30 November 2023 • by Ivan Miroshnychenko in Sustainability • 8 min read
A new study co-authored by Ivan Miroshnychenko investigates the causes behind the discrepancy between firms’ ESG claims and what they do in practice....
27 November 2023 • by Michael Skapinker in Sustainability • 9 min read
The Church of England has moved away from engagement and sold its fossil fuel shares, but to whose benefit? The shares have most likely been bought by investors who care little about...
24 November 2023 • by Julia Binder in Sustainability • 6 min read
If we are to move away from a take-make-waste economic model, we need to showcase concrete examples of how organizations can create innovative business models for eliminating waste, reusing materials, and regenerating...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience