IMD business school for management and leadership courses

20230509-FRI-Automotive_top-banner-2880×1120-comp - IMD Business School 20230509-FRI-Automotive_top-banner-2880×1120-comp - IMD Business School 20230509-FRI-Automotive_top-banner-mobile-1500×800-comp - IMD Business School
Automotive 
Future Readiness Indicator

By Howard Yu and the Center for Future Readiness

Automotive 

Future Readiness Indicator

By Howard Yu and the Center for Future Readiness

Megawatts, magnets, manufacturing, and code: The four forces reshaping the auto industry’s next decade

In 2025, the global auto industry fractured into a set of regional markets moving at different speeds and pursuing divergent paths to electrification. As this year’s Future Readiness Indicator shows, companies are no longer competing in a single global race but across multiple, sharply contrasting battlegrounds shaped by uneven demand and strategic pivots. 

  • Tesla (100.0) takes first place in 2026. It leads in energy storage, AI talent, and manufacturing simplicity.
  • BYD (96.0) remains hot on Tesla’s heels in second place. The company delivered a stellar performance in overtaking Tesla in battery electric vehicle (BEV) sales. It leads in cost, vertical integration, charging infrastructure, and global factory footprint. 
  • Geely, retaining third place for the second consecutive year, leads in portfolio orchestration.  
  • Kia and Hyundai, influential Asian players in the global electrification race, held positions four and five, respectively.  
  • Toyota, sixth overall, continues to dominate in hybrid sales; it inched up one position in this ranking. Toyota sold a record of over 11 million units in 2025, with hybrids being the dominant powertrain in its largest markets. 

Who are this year’s most future-ready companies?

The top three places on the 2026 Future Readiness Indicator highlight an auto industry that is transforming from a traditional industrial sector into a technology-driven platform industry where software, AI, batteries, and manufacturing systems are becoming as important as the vehicles themselves. Tesla took first place again, having been nudged out by BYD in 2025. Its perfect score (100.0) is attributed to the strength of its capabilities in energy storage, AI talent, and streamlined manufacturing. BYD’s deep vertical integration, expansive charging infrastructure, and global footprint, as well as Geely’s strength in orchestration and a diverse portfolio, underscore the distinct future-readiness strategies each is deploying.

1. The elite tier 

Tesla, BYD, and Geely are setting the pace for the industry. Tesla continues to lead in energy storage, AI talent, and manufacturing simplicity. BYD sets the benchmark in cost efficiency, vertical integration, charging infrastructure, and global production scale. Geely stands out for its portfolio orchestration and its ability to integrate brands such as Volvo, Polestar, Lotus, Smart, Zeekr, Lynk & Co, and Galaxy around a more unified technology stack, including through ventures such as its Geely-Renault joint venture in Brazil. 

2. The industrial champions 

Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Li Auto, XPeng, Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Ford form a competitive tier where success increasingly depends on multi-pathway capability rather than a single-bet focus. Within this group, Hyundai-Kia stand out for their electrified offerings and the Pleos software platform. BMW for its transformative Neue Klasse system reset, and XPeng for the strength of its VLA 2.0 stack – positions that are defining the leading edge of this cohort in 2026. 

Forces reshaping the automotive sector in 2026

Three key industry dynamics have emerged or accelerated in 2024–25, reshaping competition across the tech sector: 

1. The China cost shock and the new operating model

The most-cited automotive industry number in 2025 came from AlixPartners Global Automotive Outlook, published in June 2025. The global consulting firm’s annual in-depth industry analysis revealed that Chinese new-energy automakers can bring a vehicle to market in roughly 20 months, with 40–50% less investment, and a 30% cost advantage, raising the bar for speed, efficiency, and innovation. [5]  

The cost shock is built on vertical integration that Western original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) gave up decades ago, when they outsourced many components to suppliers to reduce capital intensity and improve efficiency. Whereas Chinese EV manufacturers control more of the supply chain and production process internally.  

BYD unveiled the Super e-Platform, a next-generation electric vehicle architecture designed to dramatically reduce EV charging times and improve performance, in March 2025. The full domain incorporates 1,000V high-voltage architecture and a charging rate of 10C (the fastest in the world), a 30,000-RPM motor, and megawatt-class flash charging that adds 400km of range in five minutes. The Super e-Platform also delivers a single-module single-motor power of 580 kW and a top speed over 300km/h. [6] 

By December 2025, drivers in China were clocking 746 kilowatts at real BYD chargers (in comparison, Tesla’s V4 Supercharger tops out at 500 kW). By early 2026, BYD had 4,239 flash-charging stations live in China, with 16,000 more planned. It also plans to expand its flash-charging stations to overseas markets by the end of 2026.[6] 

Meanwhile, Geely sold more than three million vehicles in 2025, representing a 39% year-on-year increase – beating its target of three million – and has subsequently set new growth targets for 2026. New energy vehicle sales jumped to 1.69 million, up 90% year-on-year. The Galaxy mainstream brand alone sold 1.24 million units.[7]  

AlixPartners referred to the years from 2025 to 2029 as the “Age of Agility” in its annual global automotive outlook report, saying agility is no longer optional, but “what will separate the winners from the rest.” Stephen Dyer of AlixPartners told reporters in Shanghai in July 2025 that international OEMs in China face “marginalization” by 2029, with their local share falling from 33% today to 24%. [8]  

Chinese firms have rebuilt the assembly line, the supplier interface, and the software release cycle around vertical integration. The cost gap is here to stay.  

2. Tariff walls and rare earth control 

A truly global auto market ended in 2025, when US President Donald Trump signed Proclamation 10908 on 26 March 2025, imposing 25% Section 232 tariffs on imported vehicles from 3 April and on imported parts from 3 May.[9][10] 

The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese BEVs took effect on 30 October 2024 at firm-specific rates of 17% for BYD, 18.8% for Geely, and 35.3% for SAIC. [11] Canada hit China-made electric cars with a 100% tariff, which came into effect on 1 October 2024. 

[12]The response to the new global automotive order became increasing regionalization, with factories built where the cars sell. BYD started trial production at its Hungarian plant in Q1 2026, with full-scale production on the cards for Q2.[13] Its Brazil plant in Camaçari rolled its first vehicle off the line on 1 July 2025, on the site of an old Ford factory, marking a historic milestone for the automotive industry across Latin America.[14] A Turkish plant is targeted for late 2026, [15] and a $1bn Indonesian plant in Subang is at the final stages of construction and due to come online in 2026.[16]  

In response to the tariffs imposed on its vehicles, China hit back with export controls on seven key rare earths, and in doing so, weaponized the upstream on 4 April 2025.[17] By April and May, US, European, and Japanese carmakers were idling plants due to a lack of magnets. A second escalation on 9 October 2025 added five more elements and applied China’s foreign direct product rule to any product anywhere in the world that contains Chinese rare earths or uses Chinese processing technology.  

China refines 90% of the world’s rare earths and supplies 98% of the EU’s rare earth magnets.[17] After Trump and Xi met in South Korea on 30 October 2025, China suspended the October package for one year, leaving the April controls in place. The pause is conditional; the control over the chokepoint, of course, remains. 

3. Chips, not trade, now shape global power 

For most of the last decade, autonomous driving was a Silicon Valley promise. In 2025, it became a real service. Waymo crossed 250,000 paid rides per week in April 2025, reached 450,000 by early December,[18] and ended the year having delivered more than 14 million rides over 12 months across Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, and Atlanta.[19] 

Waymo data submitted to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in December 2025 showed 3,067 robotaxis in service. Co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana said in February 2026 that Waymo aims for one million rides per week by year-end 2026 and is laying groundwork in 20 new cities, including Tokyo and London.[20]  

Tesla took the opposite bet. Elon Musk launched the unsupervised Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, on 22 June 2025, started with around 10 modified Model Ys and a safety monitor in the front seat, and by April 2026 had only 25 unsupervised vehicles in three Texas cities. [21] 

On the Q1 2026 earnings call, Musk said Robotaxi revenue would not be material this year. [22] Toyota hedged, and on 29 April 2025, Toyota partnered with Waymo to co-develop a new autonomous platform and to integrate Toyota vehicles into Waymo’s fleet. [23] In March 2026, the two hosted a Tokyo launch.[24] 

McKinsey’s 2025 automotive software analysis forecasts the global automotive software and electronics market reaching $519bn by 2035 at a 4.5% compound annual growth rate, four times the underlying vehicle CAGR.[25] Software is now where the margin lies.  

This is why German legacy automakers are partnering with Chinese tech suppliers in 2026, because they can no longer rely solely on their historical strengths in engines and manufacturing. BMW regards iDrive 9 as its most important software project in 50 years, inferring that software capability is now considered strategically central to competitiveness. 

4. The pragmatic powertrain mix  

For three years, public discourse fixated almost exclusively on pure electric vehicles. The 2025 numbers, however, told a different story. Toyota’s hybrids set records globally and helped Toyota grow US sales 8% to 2.52 million units, with electrified models hitting 47% of North American volume. Toyota Motor Europe set a record of 1,229,038 units, of which 77% were electrified.[26] The patent base underscores the reality. Toyota led automotive recipients at the US Patent Office for the 11th consecutive year in 2024 with 2,428 patents.[27]  

The same story is playing out in China, with the rebirth of the extended-range electric vehicle (EREV). Li Auto built a brand on it. Geely’s Lynk & Co 900 EM-P sold over 50,000 units in six months on a comparable architecture.[28] Over in America, by late 2025, every American truck program had pivoted toward an EREV bridge [29].  

In December 2025, Ford took a $19.5bn write-down, discontinued the F-150 Lightning, and shifted its strategy toward building an extended-range pickup instead.[30Meanwhile, Hyundai laid out a two-motor EREV system at its September 2025 CEO Investor Day with the aim of a 2027 launch.[31] Volkswagen’s Scout brand will start EREV production in 2027.[32]  

The lesson, echoed across 2025 AlixPartners, Deloitte, and McKinsey reports, is clear: customers want 500-plus miles of usable range and a refueling habit they already understand. EREVs meet that demand today, combining smaller batteries with lower cost. 

How the Future Readiness Indicator works

The IMD Center for Future Readiness, launched in 2021, ranks large publicly listed companies on their preparedness for long-term, secular shifts. For Auto 2026, the Indicator scores 27 firms from the following countries: six Chinese, one French,  four German, two Indian, one Italian, six Japanese, two Korean, one Dutch, and four US companies, on seven equally weighted factors: financial fundamentals, investor expectations of future growth, business diversity, employee diversity and resilience, research & development, early results of innovation, and cash and debt position. 

The factors are built from 33 to 45 underlying variables drawn from company filings, websites, press releases, Crunchbase, Espacenet, Sustainalytics, and Google Trends. Variables are normalized within each sub-sector, then aggregated and ranked across the combined sector. Future readiness is always a work in progress: dropping places does not mean a company is going backwards, only that it is not improving fast enough to stay ahead. For more details on how we develop the Future Readiness Indicator, please visit our Research Methodology page. 

Sign up to receive our latest insights and stay updated on upcoming events.

Sign up to our newsletter