What can global business learn from South Korea’s competitiveness?
South Korea’s global champions and its broader economic landscape offer invaluable lessons for leaders worldwide. ...
Competitiveness
Keeping economies connected as regions drift apart
Executives quizzed in 63 countries reveal a new “interconnected” phase of globalization, with wide-ranging implications for governments and companies alike.
The 2022 IMD Executive Opinion Survey showed that the top three concerns of executives in the first half of 2022 were inflationary pressures (50%), geopolitical conflicts, and supply chain bottlenecks (both 47%). The fourth most pressing business concern was the prolonged presence of COVID-19 at 43%.
The annual survey is a major component of the IMD World Competitiveness Ranking, which combines the results with a carefully curated set of hard data to measure economies’ relative capacity to generate sustainable value creation. Some 4,200 executives from 63 countries this year offered their opinions on the trends shaping the global economy.
The results were not surprising: throughout 2022, inflation has returned to levels that last occurred several decades ago. In their July update, the IMF lowered world growth projections for 2023 – partly due to the high expectations of inflation, actions subsequently taken by central banks and governments, the disruption of international supply-chains, and a high probability of geopolitical risks.
However, when grouped regionally, the survey responses suggest something less obvious: a potentially new phase of globalization, with wide-ranging implications for governments and companies alike.
A look at the data
The executives surveyed were asked to appraise many tangible, as well as intangible, aspects of the economic landscape. In addition, they were asked to reflect on key economic trends from corporate leaders’ points of view, and to identify what they considered to be the three top priorities out of ten available.
When classifying business leaders’ 2022 responses by region, we found strong global patterns. These were:
- Inflation and its implications on economies is the main concern in the Americas, both North and South.
- The war initiated by the Russian invasion of Ukraine weighs heavily on the minds of executives in Western and Eastern Europe, as well as those in Ex-CIS and Central Asian countries.
- Business leaders in Eastern Asia and Southern Asia & the Pacific are most concerned by the prolonged presence of COVID-19, while in Western Asia and Africa supply-chain bottlenecks are the main concern.
- Southern Asia & the Pacific as well as Western Europe are the regions with the highest share of executives (over 40%) expressing concern about how to manage remote working and hybrid working models.
Keeping economies interconnected: what should businesses and governments do?
Analysts have been discussing the issue of a move from globalization to regionalization for the past few years, as there have been major disruptions in the way that economies relate to each other. From an increase in tariffs to fighting the pandemic, economies have turned more heavily inwards when trying to solve their challenges.
And yet, most of the different regional concerns raised by executives are interconnected. For instance, COVID-19 worsens supply chain bottlenecks, which in turn exacerbate inflation. Even though our data shows that challenges appear with different region-specific intensity, addressing them relies on one connecting thread: the continued interdependency and interconnectedness of economies with respect to the flow of goods, services, people, capital, and ideas – that is, globalization. So how can firms foster this flow? Here are three major ways:
- Executives need to address swiftly the specific challenges related to their own industries and, more specifically, their own companies.
Our data backs this up. The same IMD Executive Opinion Survey in 2021 showed that business leaders were concerned with broad global issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic and environmental sustainability, both of which necessitated public-private coordination. Companies were implementing, and sometimes strengthening, existing governmental regulations.
In contrast, in 2022, executives are focusing more on businesses’ operational issues, placing 2021’s concerns at a much lower priority level. Take the issue of environmental sustainability, for example: it moved from being the second highest concern (60% for the top five most highly ranked economies) in 2021 down to eighth place (14%) in 2022.
- During the pandemic, technologies that have facilitated the virtual connection of people and e-commerce have allowed many markets to work effectively. Companies must now look into how technology can be adapted to keep pace with 2022’s new set of priorities.
Executives must draw upon newly embedded digital technology from the pandemic along with expanding investment in artificial intelligence and machine learning to assist their teams in confronting the current challenges. Technology helps improve transparency within a company which enhances the understanding, for example, of cost spending; an important first step in tackling inflation. At the same time, transparency eases a very complex process as the supply chain becomes more manageable.
Most importantly, technology improves the accuracy of estimating everything from future demand and costs to supply chain challenges. It allows retailers to have an accurate understanding of their inventory and to estimate subsequent orders more accurately, and to better understand future challenges in a supply chain.
- Tighter fiscal and monetary policies are required in order to manage inflation. At the same time, governments need to navigate a fine line between controlling inflation and avoiding a recession.
The combination of governments performing tax hikes and central banks increasing interest rates will result in reduced demand for goods and services, as well as a decrease in investments which will place downward pressure on prices. At the same time, and as previously mentioned, a decrease in estimated economic growth means a potential recession. And the increase in the price of energy worldwide may lead to higher levels of inflation and a recession. Economies are working hard to avoid this combination.
The major disruptions we have experienced globally since early 2020 have not, in fact, affected the traditional pillars of competitiveness: the rule of law, institutions and the underlying processes for investment in infrastructure and education. Whether these pillars of competitiveness will continue to be the most significant in the face of the triple onslaught of today’s unpredictable health, economic and geopolitical crises will become clearer over the course of time.
Authors
Related
South Korea needs to transform its talent and its organizations to continue to grow
South Korea possesses formidable R&D and digital prowess yet fails to fully capitalize on it due to talent shortages and organizational inefficiencies. ...
How reverse positioning can provide a useful change of perspective
Reverse positioning can help businesses understand how they are pigeonholed by customers – and reveal opportunities to improve their standing versus the competition. ...
How can we make decision-making more future-oriented?
Greater cross-generational dialogue can help make sure that decisions taken today don’t compromise the wellbeing of future generations....
Learn Brain Circuits
Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
Explore Leadership
What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
Join Membership
Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.