How China’s energy transition is reshaping global business
From megawatts to market power: Mark Greeven and Sophie Liu investigate how China’s energy transition is reshaping global business....

by Simon J. Evenett Published November 6, 2024 in Competitiveness • 5 min read
It would be a mistake to associate this inward turn only with Republican politicians; the Biden Administration took various measures in May 2024 to restrict US market access to imports and the new administration post the November 2024 election may accelerate protectionist measures.
Given that the US imports more than $3tn worth of goods each year, loss of access to the US market would have a significant adverse impact on the top-line revenue of many foreign firms.
But sectors differ in their exposure to US markets in both absolute and relative terms, so blanket statements about exposure to America’s inward turn are unwise. Using international trade data that leverages the UN method of grouping products into “chapters,” a recent Global Trade Alert briefing analyzes which foreign suppliers are most dependent on US market access and therefore are most vulnerable to further protectionist measures.
A foreign sector is more vulnerable to the loss of access to the US market when:
The following suppliers to the US are deemed to be the most vulnerable to high tariff charges or restricted market access:
By contrast, the following sectors are less exposed to potential tariff increases:
In eight sectors, growth in imports of non-US products is so weak that full replacement of lost US market sales would, on current trends, not take place until after 2035.
This highlights the importance of penetrating and growing market share in alternative export destinations to hedge against the potential loss of US market access. Geographic sales diversification can help mitigate this trade policy risk.
Even if the US does not escalate its recent policy of imposing higher import barriers, increased trade policy uncertainty will take its toll on investment, market entry, and sourcing decisions. Fortunately, there are plenty of commercial opportunities beyond US markets.

Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy
Simon J. Evenett is Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD and a leading expert on trade, investment, and global business dynamics. With nearly 30 years of experience, he has advised executives and guided students in navigating significant shifts in the global economy. In 2023, he was appointed Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Trade and Investment.
Evenett founded the St Gallen Endowment for Prosperity Through Trade, which oversees key initiatives like the Global Trade Alert and Digital Policy Alert. His research focuses on trade policy, geopolitical rivalry, and industrial policy, with over 250 publications. He has held academic positions at the University of St. Gallen, Oxford University, and Johns Hopkins University.
July 13, 2026 • by I by IMD in Sustainability • 3 min read
From megawatts to market power: Mark Greeven and Sophie Liu investigate how China’s energy transition is reshaping global business....
June 10, 2026 • by Willem Van Gulck in Sustainability • 10 min read
Double materiality assessments will keep producing misalignment because key concepts – materiality, risk, impact and fairness – are fluid and open to interpretation. ...
May 28, 2026 • by Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 4 min read
A new book challenges the conventional belief that sustainability alone drives customer purchases. In a webinar hosted by Karl Schmedders, the book’s co-author, Goutam Challagalla, explains how companies can make sustainability...
May 26, 2026 • by Julia Binder, Manuel Braun in Sustainability • 10 min read
Tarkett is not just rethinking flooring. They are helping lead a transformation in how one of the world’s oldest and largest flooring manufacturers defines its role in the built environment....
May 21, 2026 • by Pree Rao, Amanda G. Helming, Gheed El Makkaoui, Larissa Petrova, Patrick Nader in Sustainability • 5 min read
Learn how CEOs can foster alignment, customer-centricity, and empowered decision-making through five strategic growth actions....
April 17, 2026 • by Florian Hoos in Sustainability • 9 min read
The war on woke has not killed sustainability – it has stripped out the noise and left the issues that were always going to matter. ...
April 7, 2026 • by Michael R. Wade, Mark J. Greeven, Konstantinos Trantopoulos in Sustainability • 8 min read
Trust and governance, not data and technology, will separate winners from losers in the race to build ecosystems that sustain value. A remote Scottish island offers a few clues to the way...
March 25, 2026 • by Goutam Challagalla, Matthias Altendorf in Sustainability • 6 min read
Why boards must reframe sustainability as a mechanism for long-term survival....
March 19, 2026 • by Goutam Challagalla, Frédéric Dalsace in Sustainability • 10 min read
Innovation, value creation, and improved performance should replace ‘virtue signaling’ and ill-defined ‘purpose’, argue Goutam Challagalla and Frédéric Dalsace...
March 17, 2026 • by Mark J. Greeven in Sustainability • 13 min read
Ecosystems promise a new way to compete, yet most squander the opportunity by bolting them onto old strategic logic. Mark Greeven makes the case for putting ecosystem thinking at the heart of...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience