Case Study

The health of bees: Regulatory safeguards, scientific evidence & stakeholder perspectives

2 pages
September 2013
Reference: IMD-3-2409

This note analyzes the reaction of stakeholders to the April 29, 2013 decision of the European Commission to impose a continent-wide, two-year moratorium on the use of three neonicotinoid pesticides on crops that attract honey bees, except for use in greenhouses and for winter cereals. The Commission’s decision relied on a scientific report of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) that pointed to a “high and acute risk” for bees due to the exposure to dust in several crops such as maize, cereals and sunflower; to residue in pollen and nectar in crops like oilseed rape and sunflower; and to guttation in maize. The Commission used its overriding privilege to impose the ban because conflicting scientific evidence had denied the proposal the necessary qualified majority at a previous expert meeting of the Standing Committee on Food Chain and Animal Health.

Learning Objective

Stakeholder management.

Keywords
Stakeholder Management
Settings
Global
2008-2013
Type
Published Sources
Copyright
© 2013
Available Languages
English
Case clearing houses
IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Looking for something specific?
IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics