Case Study

Shareholder activism at Sony

25 pages
December 2015
Reference: IMD-7-1750

MAY 14, 2013. Daniel Loeb, CEO of US-based activist fund Third Point LLC (Third Point), flew to Tokyo for meetings with government officials and to hand deliver a letter to Kazuo Hirai, president and CEO of Sony Corporation (Sony). The letter from Loeb revealed that Third Point had purchased a 6.9% stake in Sony and proposed that Sony spin off up to 20% of its Entertainment Division to reduce its debt and strengthen its ailing Electronics Division. At a corporate strategy meeting on May 22, 2013, Hirai explained that Sony would thoroughly review the proposal from Third Point with external financial advisors, and discuss it with Sony’s board in order to decide on Sony’s stance. Sony hired financial advisors from both Citigroup and Morgan Stanley to assess the proposal. A month after the initial proposal from Third Point, Sony’s share price was smoldering between JPY 1,900 and JPY 2,000 – a little higher than before the proposal, but losing its momentum. On June 17, 2014, Loeb sent another letter to Hirai, and announced that Third Point had acquired additional Sony shares through cash-settled swaps, increasing its total ownership from 6.3% to 6.9%. Loeb explained the reason for the additional purchase as his trust in CEO Hirai’s management policy. This news pushed Sony’s share once again onto the plateau of JPY 2,000. It is clear that Loeb caused the shake-up and contributed to the share price hike in Yahoo, and consequently made large profits from the sale that occurred approximately two years after the initial investment. Could he do the same with Sony? Should Hirai believe in Third Point’s proposal and follow its advice? Or should he fight with Third Point and reject it? With the market’s high attention to Sony’s whereabouts, Hirai was forced to make a decision. Did Third Point’s calculation make sense? Would Loeb get a seat on Sony’s Board?

Learning Objective

The case provides students with an opportunity to discuss important questions regarding shareholder activism and its impact on value. Why did TP target Sony? What are the synergies between entertainment and other business units of Sony? How does its performance compare to peers? What is the business model for Third Point? How are they different from traditional institutional investors such as pension funds?

Keywords
Shareholder Activism, Value Creation, Spin-off, Financial Strategy
Settings
Japan
Sony, Manufacturing, Electric and Electronic Equipment
2013-2015
Type
Published Sources
Copyright
© 2015
Available Languages
English
Case clearing houses
IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Looking for something specific?
IMD's faculty and research teams publish articles, case studies, books and reports on a wide range of topics