Published 5 July 2022 in Magazine ⢠6 min read ⢠
Audio available
Â
Faced with a series of shocks that are increasing in both frequency and intensity â a global pandemic, supply chain bottlenecks, extreme weather, the fallout from Russiaâs assault on Ukraine â leaders are having to make decisions under great uncertainty. As they grapple with a large number of forces all at once, corporate executives may feel overwhelmed. Because of their speed and high amplitude, the changes in the current environment introduce unique challenges. For one, delaying action to gather more data â a standard approach to reduce uncertainty â can have disastrous consequences as windows of opportunities come and go much too quickly compared with the pace of traditional strategic analysis.Â
The good news is that executives do not have to be paralyzed by indecision. Adopting a three-step approach can enable them to make effective decisions even when face with a highly uncertain future.
Making tough decisions with incomplete information in still-unfolding circumstances is part of any leaderâs job. However, extreme uncertainty calls many deep-seated assumptions into question. Crises often force leaders to think of the immediate future rather than seeing the bigger picture. This problem is compounded by low-quality data that leaders will often base decisions on. When challenges are unprecedented, such as they are today, the traditional decision-making approach of collect-analyze-decide-learn is rendered largely ineffective, because thereâs no recent history to learn from and no time for the process to fully run through. As a result, leaders often fail to take corrective action quickly enough. Â
Fortunately, leaders can adapt their decision-making process with the following three-step approach.
Most complex problems can be solved in as little as five minutes with the appropriate techniques. In Solvable: A Simple Solution to Complex Problems, Arnaud Chevallier, Professor of Strategy and Decision Making at IMD, and Albrecht Enders, Professor of Strategy and Innovation at IMD, synthesize research from the fields of management, psychology, design and engineering, breaking down problem-solving into three simple steps:Â
Solvable equips leaders with practical, evidence-based tools to help solve issues at work. Breaking the cycle of âparalysis by analysisâ, this book helps readers make better decisions, faster.Â
Solvable is published on 18 June by FT Publishing International.Â
The scenarios are built from the extremes of these factors. For instance, the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic might be one such factor. One extreme could be that the virus continues to impact the world for a long time through further mutations and resistance to treatments (high longevity). Another could be a relatively quick return to normality thanks to effective vaccines and weakening of the virus (short longevity). Another factor still might be attitudes towards globalization, where extremes could range from global distrust and balkanization (low global mindset) to high social and economic integration (high global mindset). Other factors might link to geopolitical events, digital disruption, or global economic performance. IMDâs Global Signals has proved extremely useful for leaders to identify potential factors and rate their relative impact on their organization.Â
For example, what if the world was faced with high COVID-19 longevity, a low global mindset, and high geopolitical instability? At least three or four widely different scenarios can be generated to motivate thinking and discussion. Leaders should identify what it would take to be successful in each of these scenarios. This approach builds on the assumption that there are no right or wrong scenarios, and that there is still the possibility of success even in the worst-case scenario. However, leaders should focus on what they can control to make the most out of whichever scenario they find themselves in.
âAccording to Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, most decisions are âchangeable, reversible â theyâre two-way doorsâ
Identify a set of strategies that could lead to success under a range of possible futures, then backtrack from the end goal to work out the steps that would lead there. While designing these implementation plans, leaders should promote effectiveness and optionality â delaying committing to irreversible investments for as long as possible â to keep their options open. Put another way, when uncertainty is high, itâs important to privilege being flexible.
Jeff Bezos, the founder and former CEO of Amazon, underscored the importance of this approach in his 2018 letter to shareholders in which he wrote: âSome decisions are consequential and irreversible or nearly irreversible â one-way doors â and these decisions must be made methodically, carefully, slowly, with great deliberation and consultation ⌠but most decisions arenât like that â they are changeable, reversible â theyâre two-way doors.â
By front-loading their implementation plans with two-way-door decisions, leaders create an opportunity to learn from the future: as new developments occur, they can update their thinking. For instance, an airline needs to decide whether to order new planes but is unable to accurately forecast passenger demand in 12 monthsâ time. Promoting optionality could mean letting go of owning the planes and leasing them instead. Yes, leasing might be more expensive than owning outright, but only if demand is strong. Under uncertainty, the better route might be to spend a little more on leases as this affords the flexibility to return the plane if thereâs no demand for it.
In summary, leaders should adopt an agile decision-making style, continuously modifying their allocation of resources as the environment evolves. Adapting their thinking in light of new evidence might call for maintaining redundant overlapping systems, which is at odds with the general corporate focus on efficiency gains. In normal circumstances, leaders rightfully challenge themselves to make their organizations as efficient as possible. However, when uncertainty skyrockets, they ought to focus on effectiveness, identifying first and foremost what needs to be achieved, then keeping their options open for as long as needed.
Maintaining optionality, along with scenario-planning for a wide range of possible futures, will help leaders to make more effective decisions as they attempt to navigate an increasingly volatile operating environment.
22 September 2023 ⢠by Natalia Olynec in Audio articles
CSOs are becoming more senior and cross-functional. They need the ability and skills to address ESG issues across the spectrum. Suitable candidates are rare and a 'talent war' is raging....
21 September 2023 ⢠by Raina Brands in Audio articles
Banning salary histories may not help level the playing field between men and women. Itâs time for organizations to take bolder action on pay....
Audio available
18 September 2023 ⢠by Jean-François Manzoni, Julia Binder, Jean-François Manzoni, Julia Binder in Audio articles
Sustainable business contributes to the success of all its stakeholders and helps the next generation to enjoy a prosperous future. But this includes not only environmental sustainability but also social and economic...
14 September 2023 ⢠by Knut Haanaes, Bryony Jansen van Tuyll in Audio articles
Using the âFuture Backâ tool can set your organization on the path to a successful sustainable business transformation. Knut Haanaes and Bryony Jansen-van Tuyll outline three practical steps to achieve lasting results....
Audio availableExplore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience