Share
Facebook Facebook icon Twitter Twitter icon LinkedIn LinkedIn icon Email

Brain Circuits

Negotiation: How to calculate your first offer

Published 28 October 2024 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read

Making a wrong move in a negotiation can ruin the best-laid plans. Here’s why the type of offer you should put on the table depends on the scenario.

Scenario A: Both parties are committed to talks

 

As discussed earlier in this series, it pays to make the first offer in a negotiation. And when both parties are committed to talks, that first offer should be as precise as you care to make it.  

Example 

When offering a salary to a job candidate, it’s better to offer them €126,000 or €155,000, rather than a round figure such as €120,000 or €150,000. 

Reason 
  • The more precise your offer, the more likely it is to act as an anchor for the other side. This is because they are likely to attribute more confidence to your offer – it sounds like you know what you’re proposing. 
Benefit 
  • You will likely have to negotiate less with your counterpart once talks begin – you have laid down your distinct marker (or dropped anchor) and the other side must now navigate in relation to it. 

 

Scenario B: The other side has yet to come to the table  

The opposite applies when the other person has yet to decide whether to enter into a negotiation with you. In this instance, it’s better to make a less precise first offer. 

Example 

You want to recruit candidates for a particular role.  

Reason 
  • First-offer precision can create a barrier to entry, scaring people away from entering into negotiations in the first place because they are likely to see you as less flexible. 
Benefit 
  • By not being too precise, your offer is likely to attract more interest. Potential negotiators also learn less about you and what you’re ultimately prepared to offer, which can be helpful in many situations.  

 

Key learning 

In a scenario where both sides have committed to negotiations, make the first offer and make it a precise one. But, if the other side is not yet committed to talks, make the all-important first offer less precise.  

Authors

Jennifer Jordan

Jennifer Jordan

Social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behaviour at IMD

Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

Related

Learn Brain Circuits

Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
 
Read more 

Explore Leadership

What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
 
Read more

Join Membership

Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.
 
Sign up
X

Log in or register to enjoy the full experience

Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience