Are you practicing the three key steps to scaling up?
Learn how fintech scale-ups turned insights into action via scoping, sensemaking, and enabling, plus a structured checklist for growth....
by Jennifer Jordan Published October 9, 2024 in Brain Circuits • 4 min read
When you have not educated yourself about the potential range of realistic possibilities, it likely pays to hear what the other side wants first. Besides, your first offer could be grossly inappropriate.
This is where it gets complicated. When the issue is a zero-sum game, meaning your gain is their loss, you should make the first offer. But when a compatible issue (i.e. a win-win scenario for both sides) is also in play, you should not reveal your preferences first. This is because the other side can disguise the preferences that are compatible with yours to seem incompatible, using this issue to get more of what they want on the zero-sum issue.
If your counterpart has selfish competitive motives, they may try to take advantage of knowing your compatible preferences to ensure they benefit. In this scenario, let them show their hand first.
Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.
August 25, 2026 • by Alfredo De Massis, Silvia Sanasi in Brain Circuits
Learn how fintech scale-ups turned insights into action via scoping, sensemaking, and enabling, plus a structured checklist for growth....
August 20, 2026 • by Matthias Altendorf in Brain Circuits
Explore seven sustainability tests that help boards align initiatives with value creation, resilience, and long-term corporate longevity...
August 18, 2026 • by Dorotea Brandin in Brain Circuits
Discover how to think like an optimist and empower your team with proactive and constructive responses to uncertainty....
August 13, 2026 • by Amy Bradley in Brain Circuits
Identify signs of pseudo-engagement and apply leadership-focused actions to turn surface satisfaction into real team results....
Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman
Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.
August 25, 2026 • by Alfredo De Massis, Silvia Sanasi in Brain Circuits
Learn how fintech scale-ups turned insights into action via scoping, sensemaking, and enabling, plus a structured checklist for growth....
August 20, 2026 • by Matthias Altendorf in Brain Circuits
Explore seven sustainability tests that help boards align initiatives with value creation, resilience, and long-term corporate longevity...
August 18, 2026 • by Dorotea Brandin in Brain Circuits
Discover how to think like an optimist and empower your team with proactive and constructive responses to uncertainty....
August 13, 2026 • by Amy Bradley in Brain Circuits
Identify signs of pseudo-engagement and apply leadership-focused actions to turn surface satisfaction into real team results....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience