
Searching for your first board role? Start here
To transition into the boardroom, you need a brand, a unique board proposition, and a governance mindset - but you also need to consider the value you add and the cultural fit...

by Jennifer Jordan Published March 14, 2025 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
Answer: False
Assimilation is where the individual conforms to the prevailing organizational culture and subsumes their identity. In contrast, belonging is where the individual turns up as the self they originally brought to the table – and is celebrated as such.
Answer: True
Many people (me included) predicted that, given their comfort with technology and connecting remotely, Gen Z employees would weather the lockdown much better than older people. This was wrong. The ‘remote experience’ was very isolating for many young adults and their incidence of mental illness increased by more than 25%, while suicide rates also increased.
Answer: False
Belonging is not an ‘I-win-so-you-lose’ game whereby, as one group or individual gains a seat at the table, another loses theirs. In contrast to an abundance-driven view of belonging, this scarcity mindset propagates a feeling of systemic exclusion and fuels some people’s rejection of a more inclusive society.
a. 25%
b. 50%
c. 75%
Answer: c
According to a 2023 study by Ernst & Young, 75% of workers have felt excluded at work, while almost 60% feel they can’t share a core part of their identity at work for fear of it holding them back. This number is even higher for LGBTQ+ worker respondents, with 77% feeling uncomfortable sharing aspects of their identity at work.
A feeling of not belonging at work can lead to a lack of engagement by employees. An inclusion-oriented approach in which individuals feel equally valued helps create a culture where people are motivated to contribute to their maximum ability.

Social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

8 hours ago • by Jennifer Jordan in Brain Circuits
To transition into the boardroom, you need a brand, a unique board proposition, and a governance mindset - but you also need to consider the value you add and the cultural fit...

March 12, 2026 • by Simon J. Evenett, Oliver Jones in Brain Circuits
Research indicates that 14% of companies report net positive effects from political risks that disrupted competitors, creating market openings to capitalize on temporary dislocations and long-term shifts in global trade patterns. Simon J...

March 11, 2026 • by Milda Mitkute in Brain Circuits
Milda Mitkute shares lessons from scaling second-hand clothes business Vinted into Lithuania’s first unicorn, and launching a new startup to make maths education more engaging and accessible for children. ...

March 10, 2026 • by Richard Roi, Luca Condosta in Brain Circuits
Non-linear career paths that deviate from the functional norm in some way can produce leaders who deliver more impact. Consult the checklist to see whether you are promoting people with more diverse...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience