Why sustainability targets feel close to mission impossible – and what COOs can do
Influencing suppliers, complying with regulations and sourcing raw materials has become a bureaucratic and logistical nightmare for chief operating officers....
June 9, 2021 • by James E. Henderson in Leading in Turbulent Times
The once popular model of having a high-level management team develop a strategy which is then communicated to the rest of the organization is quickly becoming archaic. A truly inclusive strategy is...
Before one can strive for inclusiveness, it is important to understand what engagement looks like. “Participating means just asking for information but engagement means actually eliciting opinions on the critical choices facing the organization and including them in the whole process,” explains IMD Strategy Professor James Henderson.
But this level of inclusion has certain risks which mean even as companies transform their strategy process, there are a lot of fears and hesitations experienced by top executives. In Henderson’s webinar session he asked participants if they were an incoming CEO and presented with a new strategy from a team that had worked for a year but was only developed with high levels of input, how they would proceed. 57% said they would seek input from a wider cross-section of employees but still a limited contingent of critical stakeholders.
Some of the fears surrounding full inclusion include not wanting to slow down the process, worry that it will create expectations that if not met could actually cause employee disengagement and disappointment, and concern that it could even backfire by exposing a majority bias which alienates some part of the employee population.
However, done correctly, the benefits of full inclusion outweigh these fears.
Looking at the case study of Roche Diagnostics, CPS, which faced this dilemma, Henderson demonstrated what it looks like to strive for full inclusion in the strategy process.
Roche’s leadership team had spent a year looking at possible strategy choices and formulated a plan. Then the company’s incoming CEO, Thomas Schinecker, noticed that the budget might not support the number of projects planned, so he opted to seek organizational wide input before moving forward. Under Schinecker, all employees were invited to participate in strategy workshops, with roughly 50% actually engaging in the process. Using heavy touch digital tracking 11,300 ideas were collected, consolidated, and reported back to the leadership team.
The level of employee engagement was so high at Roche, they continued to repeat this exercise at broader levels. Schinecker says the key for executives is to let go. “If you have faith in the power of the people, they will come up with something brilliant,” he encouraged.
Furthermore, the results gave the strategy team a lot of granularity in terms of their choices. The company’s head of strategy indicated that people didn’t seem to mind how their inputs were used but they were excited about being part of the process. There is a lot of research to indicate this is a common phenomenon: if people feel the process was fair, they are satisfied with the results. So, despite the risks, it is worth the effort to include everyone.
Professor of Strategic Management at IMD
James E. Henderson is Professor of Strategic Management at IMD, Program Co-Director of the Leading Sustainable Business Transformation program, and Program Director of the Strategic Partnership course. He helps companies achieve and sustain their competitive advantage either at a business unit, corporate, or global level through directing custom specific executive programs, facilitating strategy workshops, or teaching MBAs and executives.
November 25, 2021 • by Carlos Cordon in Sustainability • 6 min read
Influencing suppliers, complying with regulations and sourcing raw materials has become a bureaucratic and logistical nightmare for chief operating officers....
November 23, 2021 • by Christos Cabolis, Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 2 min read
ESG are generally lumped together as one set of goals, but they don't always have a symbiotic relationship. Have you looked at the relationships between them?...
November 16, 2021 • by Michelle Lemaître in Sustainability • 7 min read
Among the triumphs of the 2020 Tokyo Games were a few firsts that offer lessons in sustainable leadership...
November 15, 2021 • by Julia Binder, Salvatore Cantale, Vanina Farber, Knut Haanaes, Natalia Olynec, Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 8 min read
At the UN climate summit, world leaders agreed on three ways to tackle climate change. Some say these moves are not aggressive enough. Here is how business leaders can play a crucial...
November 15, 2021 • by Christos Cabolis, Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 6 min read
On the heels of the COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference there is global buzz about ESG goals, but many gaps remain between companies’ talk and their actions....
November 11, 2021 • by Mikkel Larsen in Sustainability • 7 min read
Measuring the true impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investments is crucial to assessing the claims made by their promoters and comparing different opportunities. This is a difficult task but not...
November 9, 2021 • by Didier Cossin, Michael D. Watkins, Richard Roi in Sustainability • 6 min read
CEO turnover is rising after a COVID lull as boards place corporate culture and social responsibility at the heart of performance criteria, equal to shareholder value creation....
November 4, 2021 • by Peter Vogel, Malgorzata Smulowitz in Sustainability • 6 min read
The welcome announcement of a multi-stakeholder philanthropic partnership to accelerate the adoption of green energy in Africa, Asia and Latin America is a bold move. But, like all philanthropy, it must overcome...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience