Digital sustainability: it pays to be a leader, not a laggard
Companies that excel in both digital and sustainable transformation attract a stock market premium, according to research. So, how do you tap into that value? ...
15 November 2021 • by Christos Cabolis, Karl Schmedders in Competitiveness
On the heels of the COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference there is global buzz about ESG goals, but many gaps remain between companies’ talk and their actions. ...
On the heels of the COP 26 UN Climate Change Conference there is global buzz about ESG goals, but many gaps remain between companies’ talk and their actions. Indeed, nearly half the executives who participated in our IMD webinar indicated they agreed with Greta Thunberg that “the COP 26 conference is just a big PR event”, or believed the goal of reducing temperature increases to 1.5°C by mid-century was on “life support”, as expressed by Antonio Guterres.
To avoid greenwashing and begin seeing real, measurable results we need to first fully understand the relationship between the E, the S and the G when we are discussing and setting our companies’ ESG goals.
E: Environmental: Considerations might include climate change mitigation and adaptation, as well as the environment more broadly, for instance the preservation of biodiversity, pollution prevention, and the circular economy.
S: Social: Considerations could refer to inequality, inclusiveness, labor relations, investment in human capital and communities, as well as human rights issues.
G: Governance: This refers to both public and private institutions, including management structures, employee relations, and executive remuneration. It plays a fundamental role in ensuring the inclusion of social and environmental considerations in the decision-making process.
In the broad discussion of these goals, social considerations are often the forgotten stepchild. People focus on the environmental concerns and how corporate governance can influence change or is failing to do so. But rarely do people look at the relationship between environmental and social concerns. In fact, more than two-thirds of participants in our IMD webinar indicated they believed there was a positive correlation between environment goals and social objectives. However, the opposite is often true.
Consider the yellow jacket protests in Paris. These demonstrations were sparked when carbon taxes were imposed on the French public. While the intent was to motivate people to change their behavior, the burden disproportionately affected low-wage workers who lived outside of Paris and relied on their cars to drive in and earn their livelihoods. These problems occur when we do not consider the social impact of environmental incentives, which often present differently for different socioeconomic groups. When you consider people who live from pay check to pay check, or even day to day, the choice between putting food on the table or doing the environmentally correct thing is clear.
Greenwashing is a term making its way more frequently into public discussion, because many companies are being exposed for making statements they simply don’t live up to. It is easy for a corporation to pledge to be carbon zero in 30 years because, frankly, the people saying that will likely be long retired by then. There is no accountability built into a lot of plans that are presented to the public. But even when the public gets upset about it, the incentive for accountability isn’t there.
One of the fundamental problems in getting businesses to change their behaviors is that the transition to a more environmentally sensitive world comes at a cost. ESG initiatives have a cost attached to them, which means lower profits. So what can be done to get companies to change?
Incentives are needed to change peoples’ behavior. This means regulation at the government level as well as the corporate level. Recent studies have indicated that more than 90% of companies don’t link compensation to ESG objectives. Tying a percentage of C-Suite compensation to hitting goals would be an effective way to ensure ESG goals are taken seriously.
Finally, we need to establish some metrics by which to measure the impact of ESG initiatives, because without measures to hold people accountable greenwashing is all too easy.
Chief Economist at the IMD World Competitiveness Center
Christos Cabolis is the IMD World Competitiveness Center’s Chief Economist and Head of Operations and Adjunct Professor of Economics and Competitiveness at IMD. His research focuses on competitiveness in its broadest sense, such as the challenges inherent to ESG and the need to respect citizens’ privacy in an increasingly digitalized world.
Professor of Finance at IMD
Karl Schmedders is Professor of Finance at IMD. In his research, he applies numerical solution techniques to complex economic and financial models, shedding light on relevant market issues and industry problems. He is also Director of IMD’s new online certification course for structured investment products in partnership with Swiss company Leonteq, teaches in the Advanced Management Concepts (AMC) and Executive MBA programs, and is an advisor on International Consulting Projects in the MBA program.
17 July 2024 • by Michael R. Wade, Evangelos Syrigos in Sustainability • 12 min read
Companies that excel in both digital and sustainable transformation attract a stock market premium, according to research. So, how do you tap into that value? ...
11 July 2024 • by Stéphane J. G. Girod in Sustainability • 4 min read
A series of watershed events forced CHANEL out of its comfort zone, culminating in the launch of CHANEL Mission 1.5°. With this new strategy, the luxury fashion house embarked on a journey...
5 July 2024 • by Avni Shah in Sustainability • 9 min read
Creative industries have a key role to play in creating positive social change. Here are six key insights to help them achieve their goals. ...
3 July 2024 • by Richard Baldwin, Salvatore Cantale in Sustainability • 7 min read
The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) will impose comprehensive and standardized sustainability reporting responsibilities on firms, adding unprecedented complexity to mergers and acquisitions. ...
13 June 2024 • by Suzanne de Treville in Sustainability • 15 min read
Many executives recognize the value of local manufacturing but struggle to shake off the view that low-cost production is better for the bottom line. Exploring their options through simulations and competitive games...
3 June 2024 • by Susan Goldsworthy in Sustainability • 6 min read
The current economic system is not fit for purpose. It is time for an “apocalyptic” approach with leaders moving from a fixed mindset to a growth mindshift to co-create the conditions that...
28 May 2024 • by Alfredo De Massis, Josh Wei-Jun Hsueh, Luis Gomez-Mejia in Sustainability • 5 min read
Many factors dictate the non-financial value of family firms. Why would two similar firms with the same extent of family involvement choose different CSR strategies? ...
23 May 2024 • by Ivan Miroshnychenko in Sustainability • 6 min read
Family businesses face unique challenges in adopting green practices, yet they hold significant potential for environmental leadership. This article explores how their management structures impact environmental strategies and highlights variability in green...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience