Supply Chain Q&A: Living with change
With COVID-19 and fallout from the US-China trade war, global supply chain managers have had much on their plates recently. Next up: coping with climate change and integrating Africa, says Mark Slade,...
by Simon J. Evenett Published November 6, 2024 in Competitiveness • 5 min read
It would be a mistake to associate this inward turn only with Republican politicians; the Biden Administration took various measures in May 2024 to restrict US market access to imports and the new administration post the November 2024 election may accelerate protectionist measures.
Given that the US imports more than $3tn worth of goods each year, loss of access to the US market would have a significant adverse impact on the top-line revenue of many foreign firms.
But sectors differ in their exposure to US markets in both absolute and relative terms, so blanket statements about exposure to America’s inward turn are unwise. Using international trade data that leverages the UN method of grouping products into “chapters,” a recent Global Trade Alert briefing analyzes which foreign suppliers are most dependent on US market access and therefore are most vulnerable to further protectionist measures.
A foreign sector is more vulnerable to the loss of access to the US market when:
The following suppliers to the US are deemed to be the most vulnerable to high tariff charges or restricted market access:
By contrast, the following sectors are less exposed to potential tariff increases:
In eight sectors, growth in imports of non-US products is so weak that full replacement of lost US market sales would, on current trends, not take place until after 2035.
This highlights the importance of penetrating and growing market share in alternative export destinations to hedge against the potential loss of US market access. Geographic sales diversification can help mitigate this trade policy risk.
Even if the US does not escalate its recent policy of imposing higher import barriers, increased trade policy uncertainty will take its toll on investment, market entry, and sourcing decisions. Fortunately, there are plenty of commercial opportunities beyond US markets.
Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD
Simon J. Evenett is Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD and a leading expert on trade, investment, and global business dynamics. With nearly 30 years of experience, he has advised executives and guided students in navigating significant shifts in the global economy. In 2023, he was appointed Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Trade and Investment.
Evenett founded the St Gallen Endowment for Prosperity Through Trade, which oversees key initiatives like the Global Trade Alert and Digital Policy Alert. His research focuses on trade policy, geopolitical rivalry, and industrial policy, with over 250 publications. He has held academic positions at the University of St. Gallen, Oxford University, and Johns Hopkins University.
December 17, 2021 in Sustainability • 4 min read
With COVID-19 and fallout from the US-China trade war, global supply chain managers have had much on their plates recently. Next up: coping with climate change and integrating Africa, says Mark Slade,...
December 10, 2021 • by Vanina Farber in Sustainability • 6 min read
Impact investment is a rapidly-evolving, diverse world that offers value beyond financial returns for investors and social enterprises of all shapes and sizes....
December 3, 2021 • by Vanina Farber in Sustainability • 5 min read
Driving sustainable economic development through impact investing requires careful due diligence, strong partnerships and patient capital. The elea Foundation’s experience with Peruvian startup Inka Moss offers valuable lessons when it comes to...
December 3, 2021 • by Salvatore Cantale, Fiorenzo Manganiello in Sustainability • 5 min read
Sustainability Solutions to ‘dirty’ bitcoin’s growing sustainability challenge by Salvatore Cantale, Fiorenzo Manganiello Published December 3, 2021 in Sustainability • 5 min read DownloadSave Cryptocurrencies, the environmental bogeyman, could be a force of...
November 30, 2021 in Sustainability • 3 min read
Limiting warming well below 2C — the goal of COP26 — is a huge undertaking that’s only possible with the help of businesses....
November 29, 2021 • by Julia Binder in Sustainability • 4 min read
Do consumer incentives have negative consequences on people and planet? Julia Binder, Professor of Sustainable Innovation and Business Transformation at IMD, explores the risks....
November 26, 2021 • by Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 5 min read
The world is more focused than ever on the measures needed to limit climate change and deal with its consequences, but the social impact of these measures — on people's jobs, livelihoods...
November 25, 2021 • by Carlos Cordon in Sustainability • 6 min read
Influencing suppliers, complying with regulations and sourcing raw materials has become a bureaucratic and logistical nightmare for chief operating officers....
November 23, 2021 • by Christos Cabolis, Karl Schmedders in Sustainability • 2 min read
ESG are generally lumped together as one set of goals, but they don't always have a symbiotic relationship. Have you looked at the relationships between them?...
November 16, 2021 • by Michelle Lemaître in Sustainability • 7 min read
Among the triumphs of the 2020 Tokyo Games were a few firsts that offer lessons in sustainable leadership...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience