Nesta’s Lisa Barclay seeks returns on impact investing
Impact investor Lisa Barclay explains how Nesta is building a virtuous circle of investment in UK startups....

by Simon J. Evenett Published November 6, 2024 in Competitiveness • 5 min read
It would be a mistake to associate this inward turn only with Republican politicians; the Biden Administration took various measures in May 2024 to restrict US market access to imports and the new administration post the November 2024 election may accelerate protectionist measures.
Given that the US imports more than $3tn worth of goods each year, loss of access to the US market would have a significant adverse impact on the top-line revenue of many foreign firms.
But sectors differ in their exposure to US markets in both absolute and relative terms, so blanket statements about exposure to America’s inward turn are unwise. Using international trade data that leverages the UN method of grouping products into “chapters,” a recent Global Trade Alert briefing analyzes which foreign suppliers are most dependent on US market access and therefore are most vulnerable to further protectionist measures.
A foreign sector is more vulnerable to the loss of access to the US market when:
The following suppliers to the US are deemed to be the most vulnerable to high tariff charges or restricted market access:
By contrast, the following sectors are less exposed to potential tariff increases:
In eight sectors, growth in imports of non-US products is so weak that full replacement of lost US market sales would, on current trends, not take place until after 2035.
This highlights the importance of penetrating and growing market share in alternative export destinations to hedge against the potential loss of US market access. Geographic sales diversification can help mitigate this trade policy risk.
Even if the US does not escalate its recent policy of imposing higher import barriers, increased trade policy uncertainty will take its toll on investment, market entry, and sourcing decisions. Fortunately, there are plenty of commercial opportunities beyond US markets.

Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD
Simon J. Evenett is Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at IMD and a leading expert on trade, investment, and global business dynamics. With nearly 30 years of experience, he has advised executives and guided students in navigating significant shifts in the global economy. In 2023, he was appointed Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Trade and Investment.
Evenett founded the St Gallen Endowment for Prosperity Through Trade, which oversees key initiatives like the Global Trade Alert and Digital Policy Alert. His research focuses on trade policy, geopolitical rivalry, and industrial policy, with over 250 publications. He has held academic positions at the University of St. Gallen, Oxford University, and Johns Hopkins University.
December 19, 2023 • by Michael Skapinker in Sustainability • 7 min read
Impact investor Lisa Barclay explains how Nesta is building a virtuous circle of investment in UK startups....
December 14, 2023 • by Natalia Olynec, Arturo Bris, Salvatore Cantale, Knut Haanaes, Julia Binder in Sustainability • 6 min read
What are the key takeaways for businesses – large and small – from COP28?...
December 8, 2023 in Sustainability • 6 min read • Podcast available
Climate finance is the hottest topic on the table when it comes to doing something tangible about climate change. We urgently need to propagate the “hows” around investing in positive values....
December 5, 2023 in Sustainability • 5 min read
The transition to a greener future needs to happen fast. What does that have to do with gender diversity?...
December 4, 2023 • by Salvatore Cantale, Andrea Cantobelli in Sustainability • 8 min read
The energy landscape has evolved into a complex network of choices and implications for business. What should companies consider when selecting their energy sources?...
December 2, 2023 • by Arturo Bris in Sustainability • 5 min read
Investing in decarbonization involves trade-offs between risk and return, so why are we pretending, otherwise asks Arturo Bris, who spoke in a panel on the topic at COP28 in Dubai....
November 30, 2023 • by Ivan Miroshnychenko in Sustainability • 7 min read
A new study co-authored by Ivan Miroshnychenko investigates the causes behind the discrepancy between firms’ ESG claims and what they do in practice....
November 27, 2023 • by Michael Skapinker in Sustainability • 9 min read
The Church of England has moved away from engagement and sold its fossil fuel shares, but to whose benefit? The shares have most likely been bought by investors who care little about...
November 24, 2023 • by Julia Binder in Sustainability • 7 min read
If we are to move away from a take-make-waste economic model, we need to showcase concrete examples of how organizations can create innovative business models for eliminating waste, reusing materials, and regenerating...
November 16, 2023 • by Ralf W. Seifert, Richard Markoff, Alexander Schmidt in Sustainability • 6 min read
How companies understand their sustainability-related governance may hold the key to meeting climate goals and thriving in a net-zero economy...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience