Daniel Kahneman, who passed away last month, and his late collaborator Amos Tversky established what’s now known as behavioral economics. The two researchers started to challenge the foundations of economics – which assumes that humans are rational decision-makers, the so-called “Homo economicus” – more than 50 years ago.
Psychology professor Robert Cialdini admired Kahneman for “being always willing to go where the research evidence took him, even when it contradicted exalted knowledge paradigms, such as classical economic theory, and, even more impressively, when it contradicted his own prior assertions, such as certain conclusions within his best-selling book Thinking, Fast and Slow.”
One of the many research experiments Kahneman and Tversky conducted related to the anchoring effect. This describes a cognitive bias when people must estimate a certain quantity, such as the price of a product or the number of countries in Africa that are members of the UN. People will estimate that number based on numbers that are available to them at that moment. Those reference numbers serve as anchors, even if they are irrelevant to the question.
This principle is often applied to pricing psychology. I have tested the anchoring effect with IMD participants multiple times to demonstrate how, to use the famous book title by Dan Ariely, “predictably irrational” we are.
In one experiment, I asked the 2015 IMD EMBA class to write down the last two digits of the phone number they use most often. Then, I asked them to estimate the average price for one kilogram of gold in Euros without looking it up online.
I split the 60 participants into two groups. Members of the first group indicated a phone number with the last digit being lower than 58, and the second group with a higher number.
This phone number served as an anchor.
When calculating the average estimation for the price of a kilogram of gold, the first group was at €25,529, while the second group estimated a price of €43,617, an increase of 71%.
While the anchoring effect would suggest a positive correlation between the anchor (the phone number) and the estimation, the effect seemed to be very large. Consequently, I did what researchers are supposed to do and replicated the experiment with the IMD EMBA class of 2016. Here, we had fewer students and a lower, yet remarkable increase of 31% from €28,482 to €37,242.
And that’s precisely how anchoring works in pricing psychology. An initial piece of information (the anchor) disproportionately influences our estimate of a subsequent unknown quantity.
Kahneman’s System 1 and System 2 thinking, explained in Thinking, Fast and Slow, can help explain why this happens.
System 1: This is our fast, automatic thinking. It’s efficient but prone to biases. When encountering an anchoring situation, System 1 quickly grabs the initial number (the anchor) and uses it as a starting point for our estimate.
System 2: This is our slow, deliberate thinking. It’s more logical and analytical but requires effort. Ideally, System 2 should take the initial anchor provided by System 1 and critically evaluate it before forming a final estimate.
However, in anchoring situations, System 2 often defaults to accepting the anchor without sufficient adjustment. This can happen for a few reasons:
“Finally, a growth mindset always starts with the personal humility of admitting that we don’t know.”
The conclusion for setting prices is straightforward: put the anchor high. You may attract customers with a low price to your store or website. But once they are in the decision process, show them the best model you have available, or at least don’t start with the cheapest offer first. For example, I am still surprised by how many restaurant owners list their wines by price range, starting with the cheapest.
I do not suggest that you create moon prices or try to manipulate consumers. Showing the best offer first, the most advanced model, the fastest bike, and the safest car seat is fair practice. At the same time, be aware that the anchoring effect is just one of many biases influencing the decision process.
There are many things we can learn from Kahneman. First, understanding that humans think fast and slow by combining System 1 and System 2, which helps us to make better decisions. More importantly, it helps us to understand others’ decisions better. The many biases that Kahneman researched, such as the anchoring effect, prospect theory, or dual entitlement, are useful in many everyday situations. Finally, a growth mindset always starts with the personal humility of admitting that we don’t know. In Kahneman’s words: “We are blind to our blindness. We have very little idea of how little we know. We’re not designed to know how little we know.”
The anchoring effect is just one of many human biases and tendencies that you can leverage to your advantage – if you are aware of them.
When costs rise, what should you do to preserve your profit margin? Putting your prices up may not be the answer. Let’s assume a B2B supplier offers a product for $100 per unit and wants to increase the price by 8%. Psychologically, the buyer perceives this as a loss and might react negatively. As we know from the “loss aversion” theory, customers count losses much more heavily than gains.
Consider how to give customer satisfaction while also making sure your bottom line doesn’t suffer. For example, give them:
Learn more about the psychology of pricing in Michel’s book Real-Impact Marketing.
The EV pioneer’s once-unrivaled dominance is being tested by declining sales, fierce competition, and questions about its commitment to sustainability and innovation. IMD’s Michael Wade examines Tesla’s strategic direction and leadership. ...
15 April 2024 • by Annabelle Gawer in Strategy
AI-as-a-Service will impact executives and their strategic decisions. It’s crucial to assess the benefits and repercussions it will bring....
Audio available
8 April 2024 • by Konstantinos Trantopoulos in Strategy
Businesses can retain customers, attract new ones or shape their preferences by aligning key game design elements with strategic objectives....
Audio available
2 April 2024 • by Öykü Işık in Strategy
The findings of a global survey into AI and transparency offer practical guidance on how to demystify and communicate AI systems more effectively to consumers....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience