
Three things I know: taking over the family business Â
How many times did I secretly wish for my father to leave the business and leave me the sole âQueenâ on board? Ten years later, I cannot imagine working without him by...
by Alyson Meister Published July 22, 2021 in Brain Circuits ⢠2 min read
In the workplace, people naturally divide into groups of âlike-mindedâ others. We often spend most of our time at work organized into silos or divisions, clusters, or even interest groups. Group entrenchment happens when people start to become so identified with their (sub)groups, that the group itself can become âwho I amâ instead of âwhat I doâ, or âwhat my profession isâ. When this happens, it can trigger a deeper and more âfixedâ division between âus and themâ and excluding behavior (regardless of whether such a division exists or not). These types of divisions are the basis of a silo mentality and can ignite negative conflict and decrease communication, innovation, and productivity.
Leaders should keep an eye out for emerging subgroups that can ultimately lead to entrenchment. In part one of this two-part series, we focus on the identification of groups.
Do you have teams that are split between the office and remote work? When part of a team is co-located, they can easily share informal and nonverbal interactions that allow them to more easily find things in common. This can result in subgroups with different levels of shared trust, as well as different shared information and commitment to action.
Are people split into subgroups based on surface-level characteristics? These are factors such as race, age, gender, and language. These groups most often form in face-to-face environments or early on because similarity to others is apparent. This type of subgrouping is generally associated with negative outcomes like intergroup conflict.
Are people grouping along deep-level identities? These subgroups can take longer to emerge and are formed along peopleâs values, beliefs, religion, and ideas about morality. This type of group poses the greatest threat of divisiveness and eventual polarization.
To help uncover some of these groupings ask yourself these questions:
The answers to these questions can help give cues about whether subgroups exist and along what lines. In part two we will look at how leaders can prevent or diffuse entrenchment on teams.
Â
Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD
Alyson Meister is Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior and Director of the Future Leaders program and the Resilient Leadership Sprint, she is also co-director of the Change Management Program at IMD Business School. Specializing in the development of globally oriented, adaptive, and inclusive organizations, she has worked with executives, teams, and organizations from professional services to industrial goods and technology. She also serves as co-chair of One Mind at Workâs Scientific Advisory Committee, with a focus on advancing mental health in the workplace. Follow her on Twitter: @alymeister.
July 4, 2025 in Brain Circuits
How many times did I secretly wish for my father to leave the business and leave me the sole âQueenâ on board? Ten years later, I cannot imagine working without him by...
July 3, 2025 ⢠by Eric Quintane in Brain Circuits
Entrepreneurial talent who work with other teams often run into trouble with their managers. Here are ways to get the most out of your âboundary spannersâ...
July 3, 2025 ⢠by Susanne May in Brain Circuits
Culture shapes how people work together, makeâŻdecisions, handleâŻconflict, and supportâŻeach other. Ask yourself the following questions to check where your teams might be going wrong, and read on for tips on maximizing...
July 2, 2025 ⢠by Susan Goldsworthy in Brain Circuits
When we feel stressed, weâre more likely to operate from a place of fear and fall back on a mindset that is fixed, judgmental, and focused on polarities â behaviour that soon...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience