At best, this defensive dynamic serves to make us feel better by letting off steam, and we might feel somewhat righteous. But those feelings probably wonât improve performance, and they most certainly wonât leverage the potential of our relationships. The dynamic has created or reinforced boundaries between Mark and Lisa. Instead of closing gaps and building trust and psychological safety, the conversation may have increased the distance between them. This is the risk at the heart of the dance of trust.
Lisa and Mark are high-performing executives. So, why would they self-sabotage and not look for the underlying problems and solutions? The answer is the absence of trust: this discourages them from doing what they need to do â sharing, contributing, questioning, and challenging because self-protection becomes more important.
Letting things out and in
Trust is built on an expression of vulnerability with another person. The word âvulnerabilityâ has been used a lot over the past decade, often referring to the act of self-disclosure. But it is much more than that. Vulnerability means we take a risk of being hurt or wounded. Each time we make ourselves vulnerable, we risk being rejected, mocked, or scorned. We need to be vulnerable and take risks to expose the potential of trust. After this, there is a moment of reaction or reciprocation, where the other person might also be vulnerable.
We can think of vulnerability in three actions:
1. Disclosure â something about yourself that others donât know.
2. Feedback â something about your experience of others.
3. Provocation â something more impulsive, that will almost certainly invoke defences.
With these three actions, we not only test the nature of the trust we have with others, but we can also grow that trust. Letâs break it down.
1. Disclosure
When we reveal something about ourselves that others donât know, it requires vulnerability: putting ourselves at risk and waiting for the reaction. This can feel uncomfortable. Itâs not by chance that most of us remain pretty buttoned up when we join a new group, team, or organization. Itâs only through disclosure and revealing our vulnerabilities that we move beyond seeing each other as roles or figures of greater or lesser authority, representations, or stereotypes. By sharing something honest about ourselves â something about our childhood, for example, or how we truthfully feel in the moment â we invite others to see us as humans with the same hopes and hang-ups as everybody else.
As we disclose, if we are not ignored or mocked, we nudge past our fear of scrutiny, judgment, attack, or rejection toward greater trust in our relationships â and greater faith that those relationships will endure. However, for trust to grow, there is usually a need for a reciprocal disclosure from the other person. Trust isnât unidirectional, but we can never guarantee what another person might do.
Indeed, there is often that moment between an act of vulnerability and a response, like when you reach out to shake someoneâs hand and must wait for them to do the same. That pregnant pause is where the trust is tested. The longer the wait, the more we question the trust. This is the vulnerability we experience in disclosure.
2. Feedback
Honest feedback can be painful to give and receive, and our fear of rejection or reprisal moderates it. Often, we soften or edit feedback because we donât want to hurt someoneâs feelings, provoke anger, or risk their disappointment. How many times have you watered down your assessment of a colleagueâs performance? How often have you told a white lie to spare them pain? âThanks, Lisa, good jobâ instead of âLisa, this was OK, but it feels a little incomplete in these places.â Or instead of âMark, I understand your concerns,â how about âMark, I understand your concerns. However, your tone is making me nervous and uncomfortable.â
Few of us enjoy giving or receiving critical feedback, but reciprocal feedback in real time is a lynchpin of building trust.
3. Provocation
If feedback is painful, provocation can be downright grueling, requiring reserves of vulnerability and courage. This is where trust-building can so easily go wrong. As we have just seen, asking hard or challenging questions doesnât come easily to most of us and can trigger all kinds of defensive mechanisms and behaviors. Provocation entails entering other peopleâs personal space and boundaries. They may be unwilling to disclose because they feel invaded or attacked, and their initial reactions might be highly defensive.
Yet, if we want to leverage the potential of our relationships, we must continuously test, interrogate, and challenge each other. Moving forward means constantly questioning assumptions and beliefs. Of course, there is a difference between provoking for the sake of it, needling a colleague or a power play, and asking hard questions to advance the collaboration toward shared goals and purpose. This may require time to allow people to digest the provocation. This is what Lisa and Mark failed to do, as Lisa handed in her resignation.