Taking a full supply chain perspective on sustainability has never been more urgent.
The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change has prompted many executives to announce carbon neutrality dates for their companies, typically somewhere between 2030 and 2050. Ambition levels vary by industry, but with regulatory pressure increasing and climate-conscious downstream buyers and consumers caring more about the origins of their purchases, the leeway for companies to adopt more sustainable practices is shrinking.
For companies to reach their carbon neutrality and other sustainability goals, the key first step is being able to quantify emissions across supply chains. Doing this usually calls for dividing a business’s emissions into three “scopes”. Two covering its own emissions – Scope 1, which includes emissions released through its buildings and vehicles, and Scope 2, which records emissions from electricity, heating and cooling – and Scope 3, which includes emissions released upstream and downstream as part of the manufacturing process.
While Scope 1 and 2 emissions are at least in theory easily tracible by a company, Scope 3 emissions are almost always far more difficult to track. This matters because, as research by consultancy Oliver Wyman has shown, Scope 3 emissions can account for up to 98% of a reporting company’s total emissions, depending on the industry. Â
In the example of a reporting company with one or more upstream suppliers, several challenges accompany Scope 3 emission reporting and reduction. First is putting in place transparency mechanisms that allow suppliers to report their exact carbon emissions. However, there are currently no strict guidelines to Scope 3 reporting, which means many companies either fail to provide information about their emissions or use industry standard emissions in their reports. Even if upstream suppliers agree to disclose their emissions some, depending on their bargaining power, may still refuse to put in place more sustainable practices requested by their partner, while others may only agree to change their practices if they receive adequate compensation. Â
Beyond carbon emissions, the picture is often even bleaker for other important environmental aspects of company operations such as water usage, where data is rarely recorded in a systematic way. With climate change starting to bite – as witnessed in the water shortages now being seen across Europe – sustainability must be taken more seriously despite the many other short-term pressures companies are also facing.
“Beyond carbon emissions, the picture is often even bleaker for other important environmental aspects of company operations such as water usage, where data is rarely recorded in a systematic way”
Several trends with regards to sustainable operations have already emerged. One is substituting “grey” energy – energy produced from polluting sources – with green energy for production and logistical operations. Another is curbing over-production to stop waste from being produced in the first place by decreasing lead times, incentivizing more local production and enabling the repurposing of excess stock.Â
Replacing primary materials with secondary materials is also becoming more common. An increasing number of companies are focusing on “circular” operations, where they retrieve products at the end of their lifespan and incorporate as much of their material as possible into new products. BMW, for example, has launched a “Secondary First” approachThis means that now – as Dr Thomas Becker, Vice President of Sustainability and Mobility Strategy at BMW, explains (watch from minute 15 here) – instead of having to make a case for using recycled material, “by default you have to go for secondary materials and you need to justify needing primary [ones].”
For many products, this approach presents new engineering challenges requiring large R&D investments. Tetra Pak, for example, recently announced the use of secondary material in its packaging. Doing this, however, required substantial expenditure on ensuring that the huge volume of recycled materials it needed to incorporate into its packaging could never compromise food safety.
Although making tangible progress towards more sustainable operations will require major investment and adjustments in technical capability, many of the benefits of sustainability in terms of profitability and business viability will only be achieved in the long term. However, it’s becoming apparent that sustainable practices can contribute to revenue growth, sometimes decrease costs, and help position firms in advance of regulatory requirements. A report released by Accenture and the World Economic Forum found that companies that successfully embed effective ESG (environment, social, and governance) practices generate, on average, more than 20% higher profits.
Moreover, other Accenture research revealed that 43% of 521 world-leading companies have yet to match promised ESG values with reported results. As Anke Hampel Global Innovation and Sustainability Director of Tetra Pak, notes (from minute 47 here): “If you check where the sustainability department in a company is, it also tells you a lot of where the company stands in terms of making it part of the core of the business or not.” A useful indicator about whether a company is genuinely committed towards being carbon neutral or just wants to present a better image to the world is where it puts key sustainability responsibilities: under communications and marketing teams, or in operations such as procurement.
To make progress on sustainability, executives need to boost sustainability accounting across their value chains. The most important steps include:Â Â
Getting serious about sustainability is both a leadership challenge and a supply chain challenge. Having senior supply-chain leaders on your management team that can handle this has to be a top priority for all businesses.
As tariff tensions simmer and uncertainty clouds the future of global trade, freight industry leaders reflect on how businesses can brace for potential shortages, adapt supply chains, and stay resilient in a...
Magdi Batato, a former Nestlé executive, has spent over three decades shaping global supply chains and operations in one of the world’s largest food and beverage companies. In his new role at...
As global trade tensions and US tariffs disrupt conventional supply chains, corporate leaders must reconsider resilience through strategic diversification, regionalization, and risk management in order to remain competitive in an increasingly protectionist...
With the US Administration poised to introduce its steepest tariffs in over a century if negotiations to end a tariff war fail, companies across the Medtech and Luxury sectors could revisit protectionist...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience