The Challenge
Ruben is a VP with a multinational pharmaceutical organization. He has a large and diverse team of direct reports who are geographically dispersed. While performance has remained strong over the last few quarters, there is a growing sense in the organization that Ruben’s team has plateaued in some way, and individual feedback suggests that under his stewardship, team members have become less motivated to take risks, to spearhead new projects or initiatives, or to grow their part of the business as dynamically as before.
The organization routinely invites senior leaders to participate in a two-day coaching retreat to regroup, surface challenges or issues, and collectively work on forging solutions through collaboration. Ruben’s boss suggests he attend a retreat led by an IMD executive coach. Invited to share his concerns with the group, Ruben describes the dynamic with his team: the gradual loss of momentum that has characterized performance over time. It is clear Ruben is solution-focused as a leader and is anxious to help and support his reports in any way. When the coach asks him to elucidate what this involves – what he typically does to support team members – Ruben replies that a good deal of his management time is spent sharing advice, offering pointers, suggesting different approaches, and making recommendations. Ruben’s modus operandi as a leader is to ask: “Why not try this?” or “Why not do that?”
The problem with this, as the coach explains, is that these are not real questions. By framing advice as questions, Ruben effectively is telling his reports what to do. He is not proactively inviting their input or seeking out their perspective; rather, this habit of advice-giving is a form of helicoptering – controlling or micro-managing that has the (unintended) effect of stifling autonomy, decision-making, and creative thinking.