Are you mired in meeting madness?
Since COVID-19, one trend has silently taken over the way we work. What used to be quick exchanges have become scheduled calls, and leaders and teams find themselves juggling double- or triple-bookings....
Brain Circuits
How team talks can benefit both sides in negotiations
A good negotiation is where both sides benefit. The way to do it is through team talks – but beware of the pitfalls. The following guide will help you realize joint gains.
The pros: More brains around the table
Teams tend to do better than individuals in terms of achieving joint gains because the more smart people there are at the table, the better a full range of issues can be discussed and understood.
The cons: The trust gap
Teams trust each other less than individuals do because, in team dynamics, there is a clearer ‘us/them’ (or ‘in group/out group’) boundary between the two sides. There is also a greater feeling of unknowingness in relation to the other side compared to individual negotiators. The potential benefit can thus be offset by a lack of mutual trust.
The solution: Increase trust
Prior to negotiations, most of the dialogue that teams engage in could be categorized as ‘schmoozing’ – social small talk unrelated to the negotiations. But when teams are instructed to talk about the overarching goals they share with the other side before negotiating for real, it can significantly increase joint gains in the final agreement. This is because this pre-negotiation discussion fosters perceptions of good intentions from the other side – leading to increased trust and greater cooperation.
Key takeaway
Have your team discuss what’s important for all parties to get a better outcome from your negotiations prior to the main talks, when perceptions of the other team are still being formed and there’s the greatest room for these impressions to be shaped and trust to be built.
Authors
Related
Competitive identity: Your hidden lever in a transition
Considering a career transition? Begin by identifying your unique values and strengths. Sophi Hazi and Arturo Pasquel guide you through the process....
Bias in the boardroom: Good or bad?
Of the many biases humans are prey to – such as anchoring bias, loss-aversion bias, status quo bias, and recency bias – confirmation bias can be most evident in the boardroom. But...
Checklist: Are you responding to changing workplace demographics?
As workforces age, organizations must confront a critical question: how will extended lifespans reshape leadership, organizational strategy, and the very concept of a career? Anna Erat identifies four focus areas to sustain...