
Are you unintentionally creating a toxic workplace?
Toxicity often starts when talk diverges from action. Learn diagnostic questions to reconcile lived experience with strategy and improve outcomes...

by Jennifer Jordan Published November 7, 2024 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
In general, higher status is assigned to individuals who are perceived as virtuous. In other words, status is socially given by others and allows an individual to be admired by their peers. In the workplace, status confers such benefits as the ability to influence others (which could help employees in terms of career advancement).
Research by Feng Bai and others suggests that, while acting morally usually helps people increase their status, it doesn’t do so when that behavior is perceived as incentivized. This is because such behavior is perceived to be motivated more by expectation of reward and less by the authentic desire to be helpful or act selflessly. In other words, when generosity, benevolence, and helpfulness are perceived as the result of incentives, people are not given extra status for such behavior because they are perceived as being inauthentic.
First, you should engage in ‘authentic’ moral behaviors in the workplace, such as helping others and exhibiting generosity, because this will help to increase your status – but you should not do so when it might appear that your behavior is motivated by incentives.
The same goes for your team. While it is good to formally encourage others to engage in moral behaviors, it is better not to incentivize this through formal incentives. Instead, make sure to give ample recognition to those who behave ‘morally’ by publicly highlighting or verbally acknowledging it in performance reviews and through other means of encouragement that do not consist of tangible rewards.
As a leader, foster a culture where behaving selflessly and helping others is the norm – but not through material incentives. And remember, in this context it’s all about being authentic – this is important for attaining status, both for you and the individuals you manage.

Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jennifer’s teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

July 8, 2026 • by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
Toxicity often starts when talk diverges from action. Learn diagnostic questions to reconcile lived experience with strategy and improve outcomes...

July 7, 2026 • by Fiorella Erni, Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Having your legitimacy questioned can happen to anyone, particularly in novel, tense, or challenging circumstances. Here are three tools to deal with it....

July 3, 2026 • by Alan Rousso in Brain Circuits
Leaders are conditioned to leap into action to meet challenges. But what if remaining calm and simply listening is what the people around you need in such moments?...

July 1, 2026 • by Ben Bryant in Brain Circuits
Trust is foundational in leadership, yet is more of a science than an art. Answer the questions below to assess whether an absence of trust is affecting your leadership. ...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience