
Tool up: How to use AI as your personal thought-leadership partner
Turn AI into your thought-leadership partner: four key practices to sustain flow, align ideas, and boost strategic clarity....

by Jennifer Jordan Published October 14, 2024 in Brain Circuits ⢠2 min read
This could be seen as a simple moral or values-based question. Even if there are no consequences to withholding the information, you should own up: itās the right thing to do.Ā Ā
Ā
If thereās any chance of someone else discovering your wrongdoing, itās best to steal their thunder and own up first. This way, your misdeed is seen as less blameworthy and less morally questionable than if you donāt confess and try to get away with it.Ā Ā
Ā
Because you are manifestly acting against your self-interest, you are viewed as being more trustworthy and having more integrity than if you didn’t confess.Ā Ā
Ā
Revealing your transgression relates to the scarcity principle: information that is scarce is seen as more valuable and more important than information that is openly available. Thus, when a transgressor withholds information, it is perceived as more valuable and important than if they openly reveal it. Hence, by revealing the otherwise inaccessible information of your transgression, you benefit from the scarcity principle effect.Ā Ā
Ā
Reporting your misdeed only brings value to you if you reveal the full story. If you only reveal select details or admit the transgression in vague terms, people will likely perceive you as not being fully transparent (or covering up a bigger misdeed) and you forgo the benefits of owning up in the first place.Ā Ā
Ā
Always blow the whistle on yourself before someone else does ā and donāt hold back on the details!Ā
Ā
āYou have to bring hearts and minds with youāĀ
How the stories you tell can have a real impactĀ
Decision-making under pressureĀ
Equal care, equal share: Bridging the care gap in leadershipĀ
Self-reflection for leaders in five stepsāÆĀ
Ā

Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jenniferās teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

June 18, 2026 ⢠by Francesca-Giulia Mereu, Paolo Cervini in Brain Circuits
Turn AI into your thought-leadership partner: four key practices to sustain flow, align ideas, and boost strategic clarity....

June 17, 2026 ⢠by Prashant Saxena, Nikita Gundala in Brain Circuits
With AI making it harder to tell what is real, leaders face growing skepticism. Hereās how to check whether people believe what you say about yourself and the organization. ...

June 16, 2026 ⢠by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
AI can make existing organizational norms harder to see by āflatteningā them. Hereās how to stop it producing a more homogenous culture, instead of a more inclusive one....

June 11, 2026 ⢠by Robert Hooijberg in Brain Circuits
Protect your pipeline: actionable steps to develop leaders from entry-level roles as AI transforms junior work tasks....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience