
How to lead when you’re not the expert: Part 2 â Team doubts
Diagnose team doubts and turn uncertainty into trust. A practical guide for new leaders to identify causes and win buy-in with calm, strategic steps....

by Jennifer Jordan Published October 14, 2024 in Brain Circuits ⢠2 min read
This could be seen as a simple moral or values-based question. Even if there are no consequences to withholding the information, you should own up: itâs the right thing to do. Â
Â
If thereâs any chance of someone else discovering your wrongdoing, itâs best to steal their thunder and own up first. This way, your misdeed is seen as less blameworthy and less morally questionable than if you donât confess and try to get away with it. Â
Â
Because you are manifestly acting against your self-interest, you are viewed as being more trustworthy and having more integrity than if you didn’t confess. Â
Â
Revealing your transgression relates to the scarcity principle: information that is scarce is seen as more valuable and more important than information that is openly available. Thus, when a transgressor withholds information, it is perceived as more valuable and important than if they openly reveal it. Hence, by revealing the otherwise inaccessible information of your transgression, you benefit from the scarcity principle effect. Â
Â
Reporting your misdeed only brings value to you if you reveal the full story. If you only reveal select details or admit the transgression in vague terms, people will likely perceive you as not being fully transparent (or covering up a bigger misdeed) and you forgo the benefits of owning up in the first place. Â
Â
Always blow the whistle on yourself before someone else does â and donât hold back on the details!Â
Â
âYou have to bring hearts and minds with youâÂ
How the stories you tell can have a real impactÂ
Decision-making under pressureÂ
Equal care, equal share: Bridging the care gap in leadershipÂ
Self-reflection for leaders in five stepsâŻÂ
Â

Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Jennifer Jordan is a social psychologist and Professor of Leadership and Organizational Behavior at IMD. Jenniferâs teaching, research, and consulting focus on the areas of digital leadership, ethics, influence, and power. She has received specialized training and certifications in lie and truthfulness detection, as well as in conflict resolution within organizations. She is Program Director of the Women on Boards and the Leadership Essentials program, and co-Director of the Leading Digital Execution program.

August 4, 2026 ⢠by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Diagnose team doubts and turn uncertainty into trust. A practical guide for new leaders to identify causes and win buy-in with calm, strategic steps....

July 30, 2026 ⢠by Robert Vilkelis in Brain Circuits
Middle managers shield teams from brutal leadership. Learn to stop buffering, translate conflict, and steer strategy with clear trade-offs....

July 28, 2026 in Brain Circuits
Many organizations think they have created an ecosystem, but fall well short. Answer the questions below to check whether your âecosystemâ is sustainable in the long term....

July 23, 2026 ⢠by Francesca-Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
Habits form in the basal ganglia and can resist effort - discover substitution strategies that replace old routines with productive ones at work....
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience