
How to make your ‘imposter’ monster a trusted friend
Most of us have an inner demon that says, “You’re not good enough”. And, in an era when leaders are expected to question themselves and their decisions, imposter syndrome could be on...
Published 7 October 2024 in Brain Circuits • 3 min read
A. Using its ESG disclosures.
B. Using third-party ESG ratings.
C. Conducting bottom-up research on the company.
Answer: (C).
(A) is not a good way to obtain information, because such documents are not legally binding, non-standardized, hard to verify, and often incomplete. (B) does not lead to quality ESG insights, either. Such ratings are often contradictory, require great effort from investment managers to interpret, and do not lead to consistent and significant alpha. By contrast, (C) leads to a first-hand understanding of a company’s ESG position, providing the necessary insights for investment, monitoring, and active engagement.
A. It’s difficult to distinguish between firms that merely provide ESG disclosure and others that truly practice what they preach.
B. Assigning a monetary value to ESG issues is computationally difficult.
C. The traditional methodology used tends to focus on the output rather than on the driver.
Answer: All of the above.
Boutique investment firms typically do not have the resources to cover a sufficient number of companies for effective diversification, while assigning a monetary value to ESG issues yields questionable results. And focusing on the output rather than the driver risks capturing a status rather than a dynamic: a firm may have a low carbon footprint simply because of its business model, rather than the active will of the board.
A. From a technical and mechanical perspective, using hard criteria such as number of independent directors, and size and diversity of board and management.
B. By understanding firms’ compensation and ownership structures.
C. By understanding what governance actually is.
Answer: (C).
Put simply, governance is the art and structure of decision-making at the top. Assessing it using hard criteria and metrics relating to firms’ compensation and ownership structures risks juxtaposing the three different dimensions of ESG as if there is a tension between them. Good governance drives the long-term orientation, values, and quality of an organization’s resilience and agility in environmental matters as well as in social matters.
True G drives E and S
The catalyst for a good ESG policy starts with the governance which, in addition to triggering stock outperformance, enhances impactful and transformative environmental and social policies at the corporate level.
11 hours ago • by Séverine Jourdain, Nathalie Ducrot in Brain Circuits
Most of us have an inner demon that says, “You’re not good enough”. And, in an era when leaders are expected to question themselves and their decisions, imposter syndrome could be on...
13 February 2025 • by Luc de Brabandere , Lina Benmehrez, Jonas Leyder in Brain Circuits
In this summarized extract from their book The Art of Thinking in a Digital World, Luc de Brabandere , Jonas Leyder, and Lina Benmehreze explain how true creativity begins by looking at...
12 February 2025 • by Michael R. Wade, Amit M. Joshi, José Parra Moyano in Brain Circuits
Buzzwords and acronyms abound in the world of AI and seem to be multiplying faster than new model releases. Here are three questions to test your ability to talk tech (and a...
11 February 2025 • by Francesca Giulia Mereu in Brain Circuits
When it comes to yoga, having the right state of mind is essential. The same is true of leadership. Here are some unexpected ways you can benefit from a yoga mindset and...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience