TerraCycle (C): Eco-capitalism and “upcycling” waste
In 2001 Tom Szaky, a Princeton freshman, founded TerraCycle with the hope of creating perfect eco-capitalism. His idea was a company built on waste – worm waste to be exact. To help fund his fledgling company, Tom entered and won several business plan contests – though he turned down his biggest prize of US$1million because it came with strings attached that conflicted with his aspirations for the firm. Eventually, Tom dropped out of Princeton to pursue his dream of eliminating waste and the company expanded into upcycling – making products from waste that would otherwise have been sent to landfills. Eventually, the company moved into sponsored waste, whereby companies would pay it to set up collection sites, or brigades as TerraCycle called them, for used packaging associated with their brands. TerraCycle would take challenging-to-recycle packaging and turn it into affordable, high-quality products. Ten years later, TerraCycle’s eco-friendly products had received numerous environmental accolades, partnerships with multinationals such as Kraft, SmithKline Beecham and L’Oréal, and the company’s upcycled products were sold at major retailers from Home Depot to Walmart. But profits continued to elude the company, and Tom found himself at a crossroads.
Each case in the five-part series addresses a key managerial issue at a crucial point in the company’s evolution. The series provides an excellent illustration of the transformation process entrepreneurs go through to ensure their company not only survives but also thrives during each phase of its development. The case series lends itself perfectly to active participation by students. The first three cases demonstrate all five principles of effectuation through the decisions as well as some of the successes and some of the mistakes Tom and his team made. Each case in the series ends at a crucial decision point that will push participants to think hard about: 1) the role of resources (investment and non-cash resources) in new venture creation; 2) the tradeoffs of ownership and control; 3) Building partnerships with consumers, multinationals and government; 4) the importance of the role of management as ventures evolve; 5) effectual partnership and contingency. This case series is ideal for a four-hour session (or two 120-minute sessions or three 90-minute sessions). There is also a compiled version of the case, which works well in a single 90 minute teaching session.
2001-2011
Cranfield University
Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]
Harvard Business School Publishing
60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]
NUCB Business School
1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]
IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
- TerraCycle (C): Eco-capitalism and “upcycling” waste
- TerraCycle (D): Where’s the capital in eco-capitalism?
- TerraCycle (K): Branded waste
- Terracycle (A): Building a venture with spineless employees
- Terracycle (B): A million tradeoffs
- Terracycle: Outsmarting waste
- TerraCycle (C): Eco-capitalism and “upcycling” waste
- TerraCycle (D): Where’s the capital in eco-capitalism?
- TerraCycle (K): Branded waste
- Terracycle (A): Building a venture with spineless employees
- Terracycle (B): A million tradeoffs
- Terracycle: Outsmarting waste
Case reference: IMD-3-2264 ©2011
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-3-2275 ©2011
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-3-2286 ©2012
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-3-2262 ©2011
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-3-2263 ©2011
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Case reference: IMD-3-2311 ©2012
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
COVID-19 challenges the value systems of family firms and urges them to adapt their behaviors, affecting their identities. This study aims to explore how and why family businesses strategically respond to challenges to their identity during COVID-...
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in I by IMD
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications
in Small Business Economics October 2024, vol. 63, pp. 993–1018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00846-3
Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications