HomeResearch & Knowledgeback to HomeDisruptionback to Research & KnowledgeAikon Medical Devices Co. (A): Strategizing for continuous successback to Disruption

Case Study

Aikon Medical Devices Co. (A): Strategizing for continuous success

By Frédéric Dalsace and Mala Banerjee

10 pages

April 2022

Order this case study

Reference: IMD-7-2305

Set in 2008, the A case portrays the first 134 years of Aikon, a US multinational based in Minnesota. It is presented to participants as the baseline case, and they are told that the B and C cases (which will cover the next 14 years) will be handed out in class. The case depicts the rich history of the company, which succeeded in reinventing itself several times. Aikon progressively emerged as a key player in the ice-making industry before becoming a producer of household appliances, such as refrigerators, and then transforming itself into a major player in the medical device market (e.g., pacemakers). In 2007 the company had a record year in terms of both sales and profit, and the CEO is now considering what steps should be taken to ensure continued growth. In reality, there is no B or C case. The A case is a disguised version of the growth history of Company X, up to its final record year in 2007. When participants study the growth of Company X, they already know what has happened. It is then easy to blame Company’s X’s top team for a lack of foresight and strategic vision – “How could they not have …?” Clearly, it is a great example of hindsight bias. However, the situation looked very different from the perspective of Company X’s CEO in 2008. The key questions are: Were there already warning signs of the company’s demise, any weak – or not-so-weak – signals? And, perhaps most importantly: What does it say about participants’ own situations? Could their company be the next Company X? (The identity of Company X is revealed in the teaching note.

Learning Objective

To trigger discussions about threats of disruption and complacency in one’s own firm. The reveal of Aikon’s identity is a bombshell that makes participants realize their firm could be in a situation similar to Company X in early 2008.
Used with Jim Collins’s “five stages of decline” model, and/or with a premortem introspective exercise, the case helps surface as-yet undiscussed key strategic questions.
Participants can view their firm more objectively and better prepare for potential disruption.

Keywords

Disruption, Strategy, Incumbent Company, Bias, Success, Failure

Settings

World/global, United States of America
Aikon, Healthcare
1865-2008

Type

Published Sources

Available Languages

English

Related material

Teaching note

IMD case studies are distributed through case clearing houses. In order to browse the collection and purchase copies please visit the links below.

The Case Centre

Cranfield University

Wharley End Beds MK43 0JR, UK
Tel +44 (0)1234 750903
Email [email protected]

Harvard Business School Publishing

60 Harvard Way, Boston MA 02163, USA
Tel (800) 545-7685 Tel (617)-783-7600
Fax (617) 783-7666
Email [email protected]

Asia Pacific Case Center

NUCB Business School

1-3-1 Nishiki Naka
Nagoya Aichi, Japan 460-0003
Tel +81 52 20 38 111
Email [email protected]

IMD retains all proprietary interests in its case studies and notes. Without prior written permission, IMD cases and notes may not be reproduced, used, translated, included in books or other publications, distributed in any form or by any means, stored in a database or in other retrieval systems. For additional copyright information related to case studies, please contact Case Services.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Keep reading

Article

Navigating Geopolitical Rivalry - Geopolitical Radar

Without a robust geopolitical radar, successfully navigating geopolitics is more luck than judgment.

The ‘responsibility paradox’ in era of sharecropper capitalism

Many new businesses have emerged in recent years with few employees, no roots in the community, and heavily reliant on Big Tech for survival.

Disruption Leadership Technology Management

By Jerry Davis

in I by IMD

Article

What tramp shipping can teach strategic management

Here are three strategic lessons from the tramp shipping industry.

Annual prognoses and corporate strategy - 2025 Trends

Why the market for new year predictions is broken and how executives can better use forecasts to discern the implications for their companies.

Future Readiness Strategy

By Simon J. Evenett

in I by IMD

Article

Eliminating roadblocks to sustainable business transformation

Companies need clear guidance to achieve sustainable business transformation. A practical roadmap identifying drivers for effective change can make success more likely.

Strategy Sustainability

By Julia Katharina Binder

in I by IMD

10 January 2025

Case Study

Cocoacrafters: AI in the supply chain

Digital Disruption Artificial Intelligence

By Carlos Cordon, Arsen Sargasyn, Roberta Duarte, Siqi Chen and Yuvraj Mohite

Article

Why leaders don’t engage in strategic thinking

Strategic thinking is widely acknowledged as a critical leadership capability, yet many executives struggle to consistently prioritize it.

Leadership Strategy

By Michael D. Watkins

in I by IMD

9 January 2025

Article

Leadership 2025 - 5 Key Behaviors - Tania Lennon

The increasing pace of disruption and change means leaders need to cultivate behaviors that support their sustained success. From building strategic flexibility to broadening stakeholder connections, here is our expert guide to leading in an age o...

Leadership Disruption Strategy

By Tania Lennon

in I by IMD

8 January 2025

Article

How luxury brands can build strategic resilience in 2025

Officially, brands executives continue to display confidence that big luxury will shrug off the 2024 downturn as a cyclical one. They see it as the product of the combined collapse of real estate prices in China and a return to normalcy after the ...

Luxury Strategy Branding Innovation

By Stéphane J. G. Girod

in Forbes.com

3 January 2025

Article

Here’s what we predicted for 2024… how did we do?

Did our predictions for 2024 come true, a turbulent election year, bitcoin and CBDC, COP29 and electric cars, China, EU integration and Euro football

Finance Future Readiness Geopolitics Strategy Sustainability

By Robert Hooijberg, Arturo Bris, David Bach, José Parra Moyano, Michael R. Wade, Julia Binder, Howard H. Yu, Simon J. Evenett, Alyson Meister, Salvatore Cantale and Stefan Michel

in I by IMD

The ‘responsibility paradox’ in era of sharecropper capitalism

By Jerry Davis
in I by IMD

Summary

Many new businesses have emerged in recent years with few employees, no roots in the community, and heavily reliant on Big Tech for survival.

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Disruption

Leadership

Technology Management

Browse all topics

Cocoacrafters: AI in the supply chain

By Carlos Cordon Arsen Sargasyn Roberta Duarte Siqi Chen and Yuvraj Mohite
Case reference: IMD-7-2593 ©2024

Summary

In June 2024, at the CocoaCrafters Operating Centre, Elena Fever faced a crucial meeting with the board of directors. The discussion surrounded how to integrate Generative AI (GenAI) into the company’s supply chain strategy to enhance forecasting and simulation while maintaining ethical standards. CocoaCrafters (CC), a global confectionery leader, was renowned for its commitment to sustainable cocoa sourcing. Despite the board’s strong business acumen, they lagged on the digital agenda and for them the only success criterion was a convincing ROI. Elena’s challenges were amplified by the unknowns surrounding GenAI. Since ChatGPT’s debut, she had been urging her team to identify use cases that aligned with CC's strategic priorities and met its ethical commitments. CC’s digital transformation had begun in 2010 and was marked by phases of awareness, strategic adoption, advanced technology integration and a digital-first culture by 2020. CC’s unsuccessful blockchain project underscored the need for careful planning and ethical considerations in adopting new technologies. CC aimed to use GenAI to optimize its supply chain by forecasting cocoa yields, predicting market trends and simulating environmental impacts. However, ethical concerns about labor conditions and data manipulation persisted. Elena considered the HITL-HOTL-HOL framework for human involvement in AI decisions, reflecting on input from FMCG executives and consulting experts. Despite a lack of specific GenAI decision-making frameworks, traditional strategic basic frameworks were emphasized. Elena presented the board with strategic choices: waiting, focused phased use cases, full integration, or strategic partnerships.

Reference IMD-7-2593

Organization CocoaCrafters (Fictionalized)

Industry Consumer Goods, Food and Beverage

Available Languages English

Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Related topics

Digital

Disruption

Artificial Intelligence

Browse all topics