From follower to leader: Taiwan’s financial sector accelerates digital transformation
Taiwan is undergoing a financial revolution, surging ahead in digital transformation, propelled by a convergence of global trends and local innovations. ...
by Arturo Bris Published 21 March 2023 in Finance • 8 min read
Iconoclast: n. A person who attacks or criticizes cherished beliefs or institutions.
This on-going column is intended to challenge the status quo. Not always giving answers, not always right, but smartly challenging our own assumptions, actions, organizations and institutions.
When they hear the name “Credit Suisse”, my grandchildren will likely have to google (or whichever search engine exists then) these two words. For most of my contemporaries here in Switzerland, Credit Suisse is an inherent part of Swiss history and culture. The past weekend has been historical in many dimensions for Switzerland. The country used to be praised as a successful financial center due to its stability and lack of political uncertainty, but instead recent developments have prompted a combination of curiosity and panic. A too-big-to-fail institution has indeed failed, some of its bonds written off, and its remaining assets purchased by its neighbor and competitor UBS.
Why has this happened? Certainly Credit Suisse’s problems did not start last week. Its fate results from a combination of poor strategic decisions, a rotting culture, and bad luck. The power of its brand had kept the bank afloat despite corporate governance scandals, the choice of wrong partners, and a sequence of CEOs and top executives that were unable to restore confidence and lead a turnaround. And when there was turbulence in financial markets because of the default of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the weakest banks sunk first.
While the SVB collapse demonstrates the gaps in US banking regulation, the response of the Swiss National Bank (SNB), FINMA, the Swiss financial regulator, and the Swiss Confederation should be praised as adequate and speedy. SVB’s shareholders and depositors were the victims of a regulatory framework that allows non-systemic banks in the United States to account for fixed income securities as “held to maturity securities”— that is, accounted at cost of acquisition instead of at fair value or market value. When SVB showed financial weakness, depositors started to withdraw their money. Being forced to liquidate such fixed-income securities at depressed values, SVB became undercapitalized and technically bankrupt.
As financial panic spread throughout the world, it reached Switzerland, and Credit Suisse wealth management clients, depositors and shareholders became concerned about the going-concern value of the bank. We heard last night in a historical press conference that survival alternatives for Credit Suisse had been considered from last Wednesday, including splitting the business into parts, nationalization, and an outright sale to UBS. The latter is what ultimately happened after a frantic weekend.
“While the SVB collapse demonstrates the gaps in US banking regulation, the response of the Swiss National Bank (SNB), FINMA the Swiss financial regulator, and the Swiss Confederation should be praised as adequate and speedy”
Together with a group of EMBA students* (we are now in Estonia on a Discovery Expedition) we watched the news conference last night aware of the relevance of such historical event. Switzerland will never be the same.
My early reaction after a sleepless night can be summarized as follows:
As I write these lines, I worry about how this will all play out. There is further damage to be inflicted to Credit Suisse’s reputation when UBS disposes of its Investment Banking arm. The popular response in Switzerland, and the subsequent reaction by the Swiss Legislative (let’s not forget that the Federal Assembly has to confirm the bailout within the next six months) are both uncertain. As shown by the initial reaction of stock markets to the news, a global banking crisis does not appear to have been averted, so we need to remain cautious. Finally – and thinking domestically – Switzerland is now in a situation with a single, large retail bank, and a plethora of locally confined cantonal banks which paints a very weird banking market. How will the government foster competition in a key sector for the Swiss economy?
First the pandemic, then the war in Ukraine, and here we have a third unthinkable, unforeseen event. We are moving from an era of uncertainty to an era of total unpredictability.
*This article has been written with contributions by and inspiration from Davide Serrago, and Hanh Nguyen.
Professor of Finance at IMD
Arturo Bris is Professor of Finance at IMD. Since January 2014, he has led the world-renowned IMD World Competitiveness Center. At IMD, Bris directs the Boards and Risks, Strategic Finance, and Navigating Fintech Innovation and Disruption programs. He also previously directed the flagship Advanced Strategic Management program between 2009 and 2013.
15 April 2024 • by Jialu Shan, Yingfen Lin in Finance
Taiwan is undergoing a financial revolution, surging ahead in digital transformation, propelled by a convergence of global trends and local innovations. ...
10 April 2024 • by Fergal Mullen in Finance
It is time to challenge dogmas around fund and market size, a disdain of hardware investments, and the need to give feedback, argues Fergal Mullen, as he calls for a more thoughtful...
27 March 2024 • by Camilla Erencin, Simon J. Evenett, Pierre Ledan, Felix Reitz in Finance
An analysis of 21 economies between 2018 and 2022 finds that economic profit concentration is not limited to the ‘Magnificent Seven’ “tech” stocks – Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla....
26 March 2024 • by Raphaël Grieco, Karl Schmedders in Finance
The founder of Ahoy Capital talks concentrated portfolios and the value of right-sized investments...
Explore first person business intelligence from top minds curated for a global executive audience