How blockchain can clean up the voluntary carbon market
In the second in a series of articles looking at the carbon market, the authors explore how the use of blockchain technology could not only keep the voluntary carbon market honest and...
Competitiveness
Taking proactive steps to guard against loss of US markets
A balanced assessment of the past eight years is that, in terms of trade policy, America has turned protectionist, implementing significant measures to restrict domestic market access to foreign (non-US) imports.
It would be a mistake to associate this inward turn only with Republican politicians; the Biden Administration took various measures in May 2024 to restrict US market access to imports and the new administration post the November 2024 election may accelerate protectionist measures.
Given that the US imports more than $3tn worth of goods each year, loss of access to the US market would have a significant adverse impact on the top-line revenue of many foreign firms.
But sectors differ in their exposure to US markets in both absolute and relative terms, so blanket statements about exposure to America’s inward turn are unwise. Using international trade data that leverages the UN method of grouping products into “chapters,” a recent Global Trade Alert briefing analyzes which foreign suppliers are most dependent on US market access and therefore are most vulnerable to further protectionist measures.
Identifying vulnerable sectors
A foreign sector is more vulnerable to the loss of access to the US market when:
- The total value of exports to the US is larger.This identifies the revenue hit if US market access is lost and no further measures are taken.
- US exports constitute a large share of global cross-border sales.This indicates (very approximately) the size of the market elsewhere for goods previously shipped to the US.
- Non-US exports in the sector grow slowly (or not at all).This indicates the growth in the size of the alternative export destinations.
Suppliers to United States – vulnerable industries
The following suppliers to the US are deemed to be the most vulnerable to high tariff charges or restricted market access:
- Road vehicles
- Engines
- Computer hardware
- Medical devices
Suppliers to United States – less vulnerable industries
By contrast, the following sectors are less exposed to potential tariff increases:
- Crude oil
- Pharma products
- Batteries
- Telecomms equipment
- Semiconductors
Proactive steps
Growth in non-US product imports
In eight sectors, growth in imports of non-US products is so weak that full replacement of lost US market sales would, on current trends, not take place until after 2035.
Geographic sales diversification
This highlights the importance of penetrating and growing market share in alternative export destinations to hedge against the potential loss of US market access. Geographic sales diversification can help mitigate this trade policy risk.
Opportunities beyond the US
Even if the US does not escalate its recent policy of imposing higher import barriers, increased trade policy uncertainty will take its toll on investment, market entry, and sourcing decisions. Fortunately, there are plenty of commercial opportunities beyond US markets.
Authors
More to explore
Share
Bioversys: ‘Impact investors should focus more on equitable health’
With investors increasingly focusing on ESG topics, you might think that being a Tech for Good company would help attract funding. This is not always the case, says Marc Gitzinger, CEO of...
YouTube
Grownate: Making it easier for corporates and customers to do good
Frustrated by the limitations of using technology to do good in the non-profit sector, Lotta Relander decided to found Grownate, a digital platform that helps corporates and brands connect with their customers...
- YouTube
Marketing was the child of globalization but will be the parent of sustainability
Marketing often gets a bad rap due to its association with the excesses of capitalism, but it can play an important role in driving more sustainable business practices and consumption patterns, says...
The S in ESG: a critical differentiator
Are you neglecting the ‘S’ in your ESG strategy? Progress on social issues has lagged behind the more clearly defined environmental and governance concerns. However, a combination of changing consumer preferences, employee...
Materiality: from reporting requirement to strategic insight
In the fifth of a series of practical guides for organizations on sustainability, Julia Binder, IMD’s Professor of Sustainable Innovation and Business Transformation, explains how to carry out a materiality assessment –...