IMD business school for management and leadership courses

Latest Case Studies
Case Study
The seven dimensions of academic strategy: A systems framework for higher education excellence

Academic institutions face unprecedented complexity from technological change, evolving funding models, diverse stakeholder demands and pressure to demonstrate societal impact. Traditional strategic planning – periodic exercises that typically yield lengthy reports but little change – no longer suffices. This technical note introduces the Seven …

Strategy Leadership Decision Making
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2727, © 2025
The seven dimensions of academic strategy: A systems framework for higher education excellence
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2727 ©2025
Summary
Academic institutions face unprecedented complexity from technological change, evolving funding models, diverse stakeholder demands and pressure to demonstrate societal impact. Traditional strategic planning – periodic exercises that typically yield lengthy reports but little change – no longer suffices. This technical note introduces the Seven Dimensions of Academic Strategy, a comprehensive systems framework for designing, implementing and continuously refining strategy in universities, research institutes and academic departments. The framework encompasses seven interconnected dimensions: Impact (vision and purpose), Defining Choices (where to focus and not focus), Core Capabilities (world-class strengths and make-buy-partner sourcing decisions), Portfolio (resource allocation across time horizons), Stakeholders and Value Creation (partnerships and value exchange), Economics and Resources (financial sustainability), and Execution and Learning (organizational systems for action and adaptation). Unlike linear planning models, this framework presents strategy as a dynamic system in which changes in one dimension cascade through the others. Designed for practical application, the framework includes assessment tools that are applicable at multiple institutional levels. Academic leaders, administrators and faculty involved in strategic planning will find actionable guidance for achieving institutional impact in an increasingly complex world.
Reference IMD-2727
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
Lemonade: Is its “AI everywhere” strategy a competitive advantage?

The case examines how a New York-based 10-year-old start-up, Lemonade Inc., successfully disrupted the insurance industry. Powered by artificial intelligence, Lemonade’s mobile app replaced brokers and bureaucracy with bots and machine learning. The combination of simple product, no jargon, zero paperwork and an all-digital engagement allowed Le…

Customer Centricity Artificial Intelligence Disruption Start-up
By Goutam Challagalla and Ivy Buche
Case reference: IMD-2691, © 2025
Lemonade: Is its “AI everywhere” strategy a competitive advantage?
By Goutam Challagalla and Ivy Buche
Case reference: IMD-2691 ©2025
Summary
The case examines how a New York-based 10-year-old start-up, Lemonade Inc., successfully disrupted the insurance industry. Powered by artificial intelligence, Lemonade’s mobile app replaced brokers and bureaucracy with bots and machine learning. The combination of simple product, no jargon, zero paperwork and an all-digital engagement allowed Lemonade to collapse costs, not at the expense of customer experience but to delight young customers with “instant everything” – from buying insurance in 90 seconds to getting claims paid in 3 seconds. Lemonade’s notable milestones include surpassing $1 billion in in-force premiums in March 2025, a net loss ratio improvement from 97% in 2022 to 75% in 2025, and its first full year of positive adjusted free cash flow in 2024. Despite strong top-line growth, the company was yet to turn a profit, and its stock performance had been rocky. Lemonade posted a $202.2 million net loss in 2024, and its market capitalization stood at $4.2 billion in August 2025, significantly below its $9.8 billion peak in January 2021. Looking ahead, Lemonade aimed to increase in-force premiums tenfold, to $10 billion, by aggressively acquiring customers without significantly raising costs. As the stock regained market attention, bullish analysts highlighted ongoing progress toward profitability and improving loss ratios, whereas bearish analysts questioned the fundamentals behind the highly positive narrative presented by CEO Daniel Schreiber. A key question was whether the company could sustain its data- and AI-enabled competitive advantage or whether incumbents with deep pockets and growing technological investments would catch up. Against a backdrop of geopolitical tensions, uncertain macroeconomic conditions and increased competition, should institutional investors continue to invest in Lemonade or not?
Reference IMD-2691
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Lemonade
Industry Finance and Insurance, Insurance
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
The seven elements of adaptive advantage

This technical note presents a comprehensive framework for achieving adaptive advantage, which is the ability to consistently evolve at a speed that surpasses environmental and competitive change. In today’s rapidly changing business environment, characterized by technological advancement, AI disruption, geopolitical turbulence and climate shift…

Organizational Change Organizational Design Leadership
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2730, © 2025
The seven elements of adaptive advantage
By Michael D. Watkins
Case reference: IMD-2730 ©2025
Summary
This technical note presents a comprehensive framework for achieving adaptive advantage, which is the ability to consistently evolve at a speed that surpasses environmental and competitive change. In today’s rapidly changing business environment, characterized by technological advancement, AI disruption, geopolitical turbulence and climate shifts, organizations must adapt continuously rather than through periodic transformations. The note identifies seven essential elements that form an integrated system for adaptive advantage: capable growth-minded people; psychological safety and trust; small, semi-autonomous, cross-functional teams; clear mission ownership with outcome accountability; distributed decision-making authority; external and internal sensing with transparency; and lightweight coordination mechanisms. These elements are organized into three categories: foundation (people and culture prerequisites), operating model (how work gets done flexibly), and enabling systems (how information and coordination support adaptability). Through systematic analysis of six popular organizational models (Military Mission Command, Lean Startup, Agile/Scrum, DevOps, Team of Teams and Teal Organizations), the note reveals why existing frameworks fall short: Most address only three to five elements while leaving significant gaps, and organizations often implement them superficially without the deeper cultural foundations that make them work. The note explores the leadership and talent transformations required for implementation, emphasizing the shift from commanding to enabling leadership approaches. It also demonstrates why this framework is critical for successful AI integration, as adaptive organizations can evolve into human–AI hybrids that leverage the best of both intelligences. The note concludes with practical guidance for assessing organizational adaptive readiness and implementing the framework through a foundation-first approach.
Reference IMD-2730
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
Building an IT ecosystem at Intertech

In April 2021, Sava oban, the newly appointed EVP of Intertech, faces a perfect storm of Turkey’s economic crisis and the global scramble for tech talent. This forces him to confront an operational meltdown at Intertech, the IT subsidiary of DenizBank. The massive talent exodus results in a 60 turnover rate, which threatens to derail critical pr…

Strategy Innovation Digital Talent Management
By Murat Tarakci
Case reference: IMD-2698, © 2025
Building an IT ecosystem at Intertech
By Murat Tarakci
Case reference: IMD-2698 ©2025
Summary
In April 2021, Sava oban, the newly appointed EVP of Intertech, faces a perfect storm of Turkey’s economic crisis and the global scramble for tech talent. This forces him to confront an operational meltdown at Intertech, the IT subsidiary of DenizBank. The massive talent exodus results in a 60 turnover rate, which threatens to derail critical projects as Intertech is now competing with both local firms and global giants hiring remotely during the Covid-19 pandemic. With traditional solutions proving insufficient, Sava proposes a radical strategy: pivoting from being a direct IT provider to an orchestrator of a platform ecosystem. The case challenges participants to map the practical steps necessary to build the ecosystem from the ground up by learning how to create trust with skeptical clients, internal teams and wary partners in the high-stakes fintech sector.
Reference IMD-2698
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization InterTech
Industry Information Technology;Finance and Insurance, Financial Services
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
DNB Bank: Embracing startups as a growth strategy

The case examines how DNB Bank, Norway’s largest financial services company, reshaped its growth strategy by focusing on startups and SMEs, a segment traditionally considered unprofitable. In 2013, DNB launched a bold SME strategy, deliberately choosing a gross approach to win new startups early in their life cycle rather than a net approach foc…

Strategy Customer Centricity Business to Business
By Goutam Challagalla, Francis D. Kim and Philip Charles Zerrillo
Case reference: IMD-2706, © 2025
DNB Bank: Embracing startups as a growth strategy
By Goutam Challagalla Francis D. Kim and Philip Charles Zerrillo
Case reference: IMD-2706 ©2025
Summary
The case examines how DNB Bank, Norway’s largest financial services company, reshaped its growth strategy by focusing on startups and SMEs, a segment traditionally considered unprofitable. In 2013, DNB launched a bold SME strategy, deliberately choosing a gross approach to win new startups early in their life cycle rather than a net approach focused on the profitability of existing accounts. This strategy, enabled by a significant investment in digitalization and a cultural shift toward customer lifecycle engagement, generated exceptional results and by 2025, the SME segment delivered the highest return on allocated capital. The journey, however, was not linear. A European regulatory crackdown in 2019, following the Danske Bank money laundering scandal, forced DNB to shift its focus from growth to compliance. The bank reallocated 1,000 employees to KYC units, dismantling its startup-friendly onboarding process and causing customer acquisition to stall. As competitors advanced, DNB had to orchestrate a strategic Restart effort to rebuild its SME leadership. This involved launching superior digital tools, providing automated lending decisions within a minute, and renewing its customer-centric focus. By 2025, the recovery was well underway, with one in three Norwegian SMEs banking with DNB. The case challenges students to evaluate DNB’s past choices, the critical balance between growth and compliance, and the future of SME banking as AI and digital agents transform customer interactions.
Reference IMD-2706
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization DNB Bank
Industry Finance and Insurance, Banking
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (B) (Video case)

This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The video B case features interviews with three Vanzetti Engineering executives: the marketing director, the CEO and owner and the chief commercial officer. With the shrinking of the automobile industry, the company has had to reposit…

Luxury Marketing Strategy
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2696, © 2025
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (B) (Video case)
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2696 ©2025
Summary
This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The video B case features interviews with three Vanzetti Engineering executives: the marketing director, the CEO and owner and the chief commercial officer. With the shrinking of the automobile industry, the company has had to reposition itself in other industrial sectors where it is significantly smaller than the customers. Vanzetti Engineering embraced some of the codes of luxury branding according to what suited it and ignored others. The company discovered that although it was focused mostly on creating functional value, it had to dwell much more on emotional and societal value creation. The process of brand elevation required a complete cultural transformation, and one of the lessons from the case is that a brand is not a slogan but a way of being and of delivering value.
Reference IMD-2696
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Vanzetti Engineering
Industry Construction and Engineering;Manufacturing
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications

Case Study
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (A)

Survey after survey shows that executives think their business is in danger of being commoditized. This means their company is not able to differentiate sufficiently to command higher market prices and profits. Luxury brands, by contrast, are the opposite of commodity. Their whole approach to branding is based on desirability. This case series e…

Luxury Marketing Strategy
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2688, © 2025
The power of brand-led differentiation: What Vanzetti Engineering learned from luxury brands (A)
By Stéphane J. G. Girod and Martin Králik
Case reference: IMD-2688 ©2025
Summary
Survey after survey shows that executives think their business is in danger of being commoditized. This means their company is not able to differentiate sufficiently to command higher market prices and profits. Luxury brands, by contrast, are the opposite of commodity. Their whole approach to branding is based on desirability. This case series explores what companies can learn from luxury brands without becoming luxury brands themselves. The written A case gives a short background on Vanzetti Engineering, which is facing intensifying competition in an evolving marketplace, and launches the first question for discussion.
Reference IMD-2688
Copyright ©2025
Copyright owner IMD Copyright
Organization Vanzetti Engineering
Industry Construction and Engineering;Manufacturing
Available Languages English
Contact

Research Information & Knowledge Hub for additional information on IMD publications