IMD business school for management and leadership courses

Over the past decade, Asian companies have been launching accelerated and wide-ranging digital transformation initiatives. This has enabled some of them to become leading national and even international players, as well as digital pioneers in their respective industries. This case examines the successful digital transformation undertaken by the Chinese company Midea, one of the world’s leading home appliance manufacturers. By digitally transforming the company, Midea improved its financial performance and reshaped its business on a wider scale. While many cases that address digital transformation focus on the early phases of the process, Midea’s case illustrates a successfully completed digital business transformation. This allows participants to have an overview of the entire digital transformation journey and see what the potential outcomes might be.

The case series is an experiential exercise in virtual collaboration based on the commercial printing industry. Teams are located in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. One team is mandated to oversee the production of two prototype printers, while the other two teams are responsible for producing the new flexographic and rotogravure protypes. The teams are given strict deadlines, budgets and operating constraints. The C case assigns the Italian team responsibility for manufacturing the rotogravure prototype.

The case series is an experiential exercise in virtual collaboration based on the commercial printing industry. Teams are located in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. One team is mandated to oversee the production of two prototype printers, while the other two teams are responsible for producing the new flexographic and rotogravure protypes. The teams are given strict deadlines, budgets and operating constraints. The B case assigns the German team responsibility for manufacturing the flexographic prototype..

The case series is an experiential exercise in virtual collaboration based on the commercial printing industry. Teams are located in Switzerland, Germany and Italy. One team is mandated to oversee the production of two prototype printers, while the other two teams are responsible for producing the new flexographic and rotogravure protypes. The teams are given strict deadlines, budgets and operating constraints. The A case mandates the Swiss team with overall responsibility for managing the production of the two prototypes.

CCI was The Coca-Cola Company’s local partner operating in Turkey and Central Asia. By the mid-2000s, CCI had grown from a single-country bottler to a multinational enterprise. Burak Başarır, CEO since 2014, had been the main driver in the transformation. Early in 2020, Başarır had just completed a successful investor tour when governments worldwide began to announce Covid-related lockdowns. CCI’s investors wanted Başarır to continue delivering increased performance and the international growth strategy, while doing more for environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG). Başarır wondered whether he should focus on keeping employees safe, ESG or delivering the company’s financial and strategic objectives. He opted to do all three and the case follows him on this journey. Because this is a multifaced case, it can be used to teach strategy, leadership, and/or ESG.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.

In the wake of the Paris Agreement and commitments by the EU, many nations committed to reducing their carbon emissions to zero by 2050 as a response to climate change. In this environment, pressure on the shipping industry, a significant contributor to greenhouse gases (up to 4%), was mounting. In December 2018, Maersk, the world’s largest container operator with a market share of over 20%, pledged to have net-zero carbon ships by 2030 and net-zero carbon operations by 2050, driving innovation in new fuels and technologies. Furthermore, in February 2021 Maersk led the way by announcing its plan to launch a container ship capable of running on e-methanol or bio-methanol by 2023. Would other industry players follow suit? How would they address the decarbonization agenda for the shipping industry? After general discussion, participants adopt the roles of competitors – described in the five accompanying short cases – to identify which key strategies they should take to decarbonize shipping: 1. Reduce the cost gap between new green fuels and marine fuel oil by involving both governments and associations (carbon tax, carbon credits or subsidies). 2. Decide which fuel(s)/scrubber technology/propulsion method to proceed with for future builds and existing fleets. 3. Determine how to rally the industry around their choices through competitor and value chain alliances.