Carlos storms out of the meeting room. He heads to his office to calm down. Fifteen minutes later, he returns to the meeting room to resume the discussion. But the atmosphere has shifted. Carlos’s team members are more muted. They avoid eye contact with him and with each other. The conversation is peppered with awkward silences. Even though Carlos is purposeful about giving positive encouragement to drive the discussion forward, he’s struggling with his emotions inside. He keeps reliving the exchange with Bettina and finds it hard to listen and stay focused.
What can you take away from Carlos’s story? Does it resonate with you? Have you ever been in a situation like this?
I have met and worked with many executives like Carlos over the years, decision-makers who struggle to hold the intrinsic dissonance — the discordant, contradictory information, inputs, needs, and demands that accompany leadership. These leaders find it hard to manage the emotions and feelings that the responsibility, pressure, and complexity of the role excite.
In this anecdote, Carlos is easily provoked and moved to anger, self-defense, and emotional retaliation. Instead of checking these feelings, he gives them full vent. As a result, his team immediately shuts down. Even when the conversation resumes, and Carlos shares positive signs and cues, he also feels shut down. More importantly, he has lost a chance to listen, learn, and grow as a result.
So, what can Carlos do?
Managing other people successfully and effectively requires you to manage the dissonance of leadership. It requires you to manage the different elements of your identity and yourself that you bring to the role — the aspects of selfhood that serve the role’s and the organization’s needs. Doing these things well is contingent on how good you are at self-reflection.